The same near absence of molecular attraction of the singular electrons of water hydrogen that makes water support life also makes water the most powerful non-radioactive energy known. It allows immensely more output of pressure energy than input of heat-activation energy. This atomic energy characteristic of more output than input energy of a heat reaction has been recorded imprecisely as merely critical pressure per heat level without definitive recognition for over 150 years in the standard steam table.

A revolutionary turbocam engine system enables the Water Atomic Engine to generate and to use the non-fractionation water atomic energy safely and efficiently.

For more information, contact Ms. Anju Nelson or Dr. Daniel Nelson at 407-294-6039, email: rocketjet@cs.com or at 5897 Lakeville Road, Orlando, Florida 32818, USA.

Initial investment is now being accepted. Limited numbers of initial investors can be co-founders of the Company, Rocketjet, Inc. The company name of Rocketjet came from Physics of Rocket Science invention by Dr. Nelson during the Rocket Development Era.

This will end the entire Energy Industry.Investments in oil, gas,ethanol,nuclear energy, coal,wind power,solar energy, geothermal energy and other energy systems which are not liquidated before this revolutionary advancement is known publicly will quite quickly become part of a ubiquitous disaster that helps the rest of the world.

We are glad to have found an end to all energy problems and would like to help avoid all side-effect disaster possible. Please let us help you by helpng this world-changng advancement in its infancy.

Thank you,

Dr. Daniel Nelson

a site to share if you should be interested…

http://www.themanhattanprojectof2009.com

http://www.howmuchenergydoesmycaruse.com

Now is a good time to get into some energy stocks and funds.

According to energy investment banker Matthew Simmons, global oil production is now declining, from 74 million barrels per day to 60 million barrels per day by 2015. During the same time demand will increase 14%.

This is equivalent to a 33% drop in 7 years. No one can reverse this trend, nor can we conserve our way out of this catastrophe. Because the demand for oil is so high, it will always be higher than production; thus the depletion rate will continue until all recoverable oil is extracted.

Alternatives will not even begin to fill the gap. And most alternatives yield electric power, but we need liquid fuels for tractors/combines, 18 wheel trucks, trains, ships, and mining equipment.

We are facing the collapse of the highways that depend on diesel trucks for maintenance of bridges, cleaning culverts to avoid road washouts, snow plowing, roadbed and surface repair. When the highways fail, so will the power grid, as highways carry the parts, transformers, steel for pylons, and high tension cables, all from far away. With the highways out, there will be no food coming in from “outside,” and without the power grid virtually nothing works, including home heating, pumping of gasoline and diesel, airports, communications, and automated systems.

This is documented in a free 48 page report that can be downloaded, website posted, distributed, and emailed: http://www.peakoilassociates.com/POAnalysis.html

I used to live in NH, but moved to a safer place. Anyone interested in relocating to a nice, pretty, sustainable area, good climate with much rain and good soil?

The ‘modern’ post WWII suburban/consumer ‘lifestyle’ is destructive and pointless. “Without meaning there would be wisdom in economic isolationism,”

The key words are ‘without meaning’. The pointless and senseless churning for no end other than to expend credit and thereby enrich the priveileged has finally played itself out. Forget about fixing it. Time to move on.

People live to be happy. It’s part of the Declaration of Independence; ‘Life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness’. There is nothing spoken or written about consumer products, and the attendant waste.

The American Way; a path leading to bankruptcy. What a legacy to leave to our children.

Yes, we all know that other nations are building nuclear plants, but nuclear plant construction needs to be site-specific. The engineering plans for a given location are not the same as for another, and new federal regulations regarding nuclear waste make this even moreso here in the US.

The problem with drilling in the OCS is that it is 1) unnecessary, 2) irrelevant to bringing down gasoline prices, 3) the problem of “enabling” an attachment to resources that are hurting us economically and environmentally. We need those windfall profits to go into responsible research that will build a sustainable future energy economy, clean and free of toxic contaminants.

You have written an impressively poorly informed article. No nuclear plant has been built in three decades in the US, fine. Do you know that other countries exist in the world? France, Finland, China, India are all currently building nuclear plants. Your assertion that nuclear technology somehow needs to start from square one (?) is patently absurd. We have tested technology which could be deployed now if the political will were there.

Enough of this poorly informed enviro-hysterical drivel.

Regarding offshore drilling, if the problem with allowing drilling in the OCS is the profits that will be gained by oil companies, why don’t you propose higher taxes on extracted US oil or higher lease prices? Actually, that’s a rhetorical question. You don’t like this possibility because your supposed concern for unfair profits is total BS. The real reason you don’t want offshore drilling is because you are intellectually (if not financially!) invested in “alternative energy” technologies. You have every motivation to see oil prices rise into the stratosphere.

It’s people like you we have to “thank” that the US is so totally beholden to the coal industry.