One year after Mohammed al-Bouazizi lit himself on fire in protest against mistreatment by police, sparking a movement that has toppled regimes in Tunisia, Egypt and Libya, a global wave of popular protest continues, from the Arabic-speaking world to Europe, India, Chile, the United States and Russia. Today, democracy advocates protest unlawful detention, arbitrary power and socio-economic injustice across the world.

December 17, 2011, marks the one year anniversary of Mohammed al-Bouazizis desperate self-immolation, the 24th birthday of Bradley Manning, a US Army private held in solitary confinement in conditions some have described as torture, for allegedly releasing secret documents, and the three-month mark of the Occupy Wall Street movement seeking to take back public spaces, Constitutional liberties, and the fundamental right to active participation.

Tragically, in Egypt, this day of worldwide celebration and peaceful protest is being marked by a deliberate campaign of killing against unarmed civilian demonstrators, by the last holdouts of the old criminal regime, who now say democratic gatherings are counter-revolutionary activities that warrant deadly force.

The news from Cairo today: military police squads stormed into Tahrir Square, lit the protest camp on fire, have shot and killed an unknown number of unarmed civilians, and have allegedly begin throwing people off of a bridge into the Nile River. The depraved indifference to human life is so extreme, the civilian advisory council, that was supposed to lend some legitimacy to the military junta running the country, has resigned in protest.

It now appears that under the negotiations agreed after the fall of Hosni Mubarak, the military council now longer wields any legitimate authority, and it is time forth international community to apply maximum pressure to force all military personnel out of power and implement an immediate, and orderly, transition to 100% civilian rule.

All acts of violence against civilian demonstrators must now be treated by the international community as deliberate, coordinated crimes against humanity, and arrest warrants and/or material witness warrants issued for every member of the ruling military council. International warrants should be put on hold only if the crimes committed are prosecuted through a credible, legitimate, transparent system of due process, in Egypt.

In Syria, after 9 months of resistance to the escalating aggression and violence of the Assad regime against its own people, at least 35 people have been killed in direct military assaults against civilians. Russia and China are blocking direct action through the United Nations Security Council, but Assad has now lost all legitimacy, and will likely be the next dictator swept from the scene. One can only hope it is achieved before he kills another 5,000 of his own people.

In the United States, the use of paramilitary tactics and alternative combat weaponry (including chemical agents, LRAD sound cannon, flash-bang grenades and rubber bullets) to evict or shut down Occupy protest camps, has become commonplace. There is, now, a mounting popular concern about the commitment of elected officials to the fundamental principles of the Constitution.

Instead of honoring the historic force of principle being expressed by the American people, city governments across the US have given in to the darkest temptations of arbitrary power, and have declared the commons off limits for peaceful protest, using potentially deadly force at times to bar citizens from exercising their constitutional rights to free assembly, free speech and open protest (to petition the government for a redress of grievances, many and far-reaching).

But TIME Magazine, recognizing the worldwide wave of citizen awakening that has marked the year 2011, has named The Protester its Person of the Year. Across the middle east, across Europe, in India, Chile, the United States, and now in Russia, a movement of citizen-centered activism is not only occupying public spaces to demand immediate positive change in political and economic structures, but is now publishing, webcasting and building a global collaboration to bear witness to any and all obstacles to genuine democracy.

On December 17, 2011, hundreds of thousands of people across the world are honoring the cause of humanity: freedom, dignity, equal treatment and equal opportunity, and the primacy of the citizen over the power of the public servant. #D17 is intended to be a global day of celebration and resistance.

The Occupy movement in the United States marks its third full month in practice today, and a transition to focused actions to right injustices is underway. Occupy assemblies are discussing and deciding plans for new encampments and an OccupyHomes movement is spreading, as legal advisers, protesters, concerned citizens and others, join together to literally take back foreclosed homes from banks the occupiers accuse of criminal activity and predatory mortgage and foreclosure practices.

The world will enter the year 2012 infused with a now explicit and spreading demand for an end to all forms of tyranny, including that great weapon of all tyrants: official secrecy. Technology, democratic process, creative media and nonviolent civil disobedience are converging to allow citizen volunteers to retake the reins of the decision-making process, potentially turning advisory protest movement into a new civic order, designed to uphold and propagate genuine democratic rights and safeguards.

Engaged citizens everywhere should demand that every public official at every level honor the primacy of citizens over the exercise of power.

Amid the mounting fiscal and economic crisis that is threatening to undermine the project of European integration, the Group of Lecce has issued a new statement on the need to reform European economic governance. The Group of Lecce aims to develop policies “to strengthen economic and financial multilateralism”, strengthening the democratic underpinnings of the Union, along with the dynamism of the European economy, through advanced ongoing cooperation.

According to this report: “we do not see any alternative to reinforcing cooperation and to achieving stronger unity across and within the EU, with the very same spirit that has animated in the past all major reforms of the European institutions. Indeed, a major step forward to greater cooperation and unity would make Europe the strong international player that all its national economies need to face the challenges of todayrsquo;s globalised world.”

As today’s more-than-ever integrated Europe faces a crisis of unprecedented proportions, and some in government speak openly of dismantling, at least in part, the common currency or other mechanisms for long-term cooperative integration, the Group of Lecce argues that major structural reforms are needed, to move the Union closer to real, viable, and more agile, policy integration.

The report also concludes that: “We strongly believe that the apparent trade offs between democracy and efficiency, and between solidarity and rigor in managing EU economic policies can be resolved by establishing an adequate system of checks and balances, and by limiting to the extent possible emergency and transitory intergovernmental measures and actions. Severe difficulties seem to lie in the different degrees of integration characterizing the Euro area and the other EU members. A higher economic and fiscal integration is necessary for the European Monetary Union to work effectively…”

• To read the full report, visit ProjectQuipu.net

Hundreds of thousands of Egyptians are gathering for a nonviolent “Last Chance” pro-democracy protest. Military police have killed at least 41 unarmed civilians since last Saturday. Today, the massive numbers of civilians who turned out are demanding an end to military rule, and an orderly transition to genuine democracy. The 9 months of military rule have seen little progress in the dismantling of the violent, corrupt Mubarak regime.

Once again, Egyptian citizens of all ages have converged on the square which was the heart of the peaceful uprising that brought an end to three decades of dictatorship under the presidency of Hosni Mubarak. The demonstrators include families with small children, and a broad cross-section of Egyptian society. The massive show of public support for the pro-democracy movement is yet another show of defiance as civilians demand an end to the use of lethal force against to crush dissent in Egypt.

The Egyptian-American writer and activist Mona Eltahawy, traveled to Cairo, to join the new round of demonstrations, to support her people and her country, and to stand with those brave souls calling for an end to violence and a real transition to democracy. She was detained, battered and abused, and says multiple guards attempted to sexually assault her. She said her treatment was not unique and that such brutality was one of the motivating forces behind the Tahrir Square demonstrations.

The spreading Occupy movement has seen one after another sit-in, protest camp or march brutally and inexcusably assaulted by paramilitary police actions, using chemical agents and other weapons of war, against unarmed, nonviolent citizens exercising their basic constitutional rights. The result has been a rash of unfettered violence across the world against pro-democracy advocates.

In Egypt, officials have openly said they should be allowed to use military violence against civilian demonstrators, because it is being done across the United States. After the atrocities of Oakland, when police fired rubber bullets, flash-bang grenades and tear gas canisters at point-blank range at penned-in, unarmed demonstrators, sending ex-Marine Scott Olsen to the hospital with a fractured skull and brain injuries, the use of paramilitary tactics seems only to have spread.

In New York City, Mayor Michael Bloomberg last week staged an unannounced, midnight raid on the original Occupy Wall Street protest site, using chemical weapons, LRAD combat sound cannon, and police officers in riot gear swinging wildly with billy clubs against anyone in sight, regardless of threat or posture. There has been no penalty, and no punishment, for officers engaged in aggravated assault against civilians.

Mayor Bloomberg deployed counter-terrorist police helicopters to the scene of the violent assault, to prevent news helicopters from filming what occurred. Press were banned from the site, by what authority it remains unclear. At least 26 journalists were assaulted, beaten, injured, and/or detained, on the night of the Zuccotti Park raid. There was a planned, deliberate use of violence and combat tactics against unarmed, nonviolent, even sleeping and prone demonstrators.

The brutality of the raid was so severe that when City Councilman Ydanis Rodriguez (D-Washington Heights) rushed to the site to observe and to make the case against the use of violence to disperse the protesters, he was assaulted by police and arrested for disorderly conduct. According to the New York Daily News: Several people detained with him told me Rodriguez was bleeding badly from a gash in his forehead. Still, by 6 p.m., he had not been arraigned and his lawyer, Leo Glickman, had not been allowed to see him.

Glickman says his client is not even being afforded the basic due process protections afforded to any arrestee and that the citys treatment of the protest and of the councilman is an effort to silence the movement. At least one retired state Supreme Court justice also found her attempts to provide legal observation to the raid obstructed. The Daily News reports the scene as follows:

Retired Supreme Court Judge Karen Smith can’t believe what she saw this week. At the urging of her son, who joined the Zuccotti Park protests weeks ago, Smith had volunteered to be a legal observer in case of mass arrests.

She received a text message early Tuesday that a bust was imminent, so she got to Zuccotti around 1:30 a.m. As she exited the subway at Broadway and Dey St., she met a wall of cops in riot gear who were preventing people from getting anywhere near the park.

“There was a black woman standing next to me,” Smith said. “She kept frantically telling the cops her daughter was in the park and she wanted to make sure the girl was okay.”

“All of a sudden, a cop takes his baton and cracks her in the head,” Smith said. “She hadn’t done a thing. Then they started chasing people down the street.”

Smith’s efforts to get police to recognize her as a legal observer proved futile. Likewise, several reporters who were arrested while covering the protest found their press credentials worthless.

Crimes were committed by authorities that directly violate the Constitution of the United States and its fundamental protections for free speech, freedom of the press and the freedom of the people to peaceably assemble. The denial of access to counsel for some and the barring of press and legal observers from the scene is a clear attempt to circumvent the right of the people to petition their government for the redress of grievances. Some First Amendment advocates have accused the city of barring press and legal observers in order to 1) undermine the evidentiary process and 2) allow for impunity in the use of extreme force by police.

Across the United States, we are witnessing, sadly, one after another mayor decide that the free exercise of constitutional liberties is a threat to public order, only to deploy paramilitary tactics to crush peaceful protests.

There are accusations of a coordinated planning strategy among mayors to determine what level of force they will deploy, and by what means, to crush the demonstrations. Some mayors offices have claimed the right to secrecy for security reasons, and there are Freedom of Information filings being made to learn who knew what when, and who gave which order that led to police firing on demonstrators, or using chemical weapons in unprovoked attacks against citizens.

In Egypt, where the nonviolent Tahrir Square uprising brought down the dictator Hosni Mubarak, in just 18 days between January 25 and February 11 of this year, authorities are now openly citing the actions of American mayors and police forces as justification for their use of extreme violence against nonviolent civilian demonstrators calling for genuine democratic reform. Mayors Bloomberg, Emanuel, Quan and others, are aiding and abetting the use of extreme violence to crush pro-democracy movements across the world.

This is not hyperbole. This is not interpretation. This is what is happening:

• In the streets of New York City, paramilitary forces were deployed, using tactics designed for armed combat in a warzone, using weapons designed specifically for combat in a war zone, deploying chemical weapons against unarmed civilians and banning all press coverage of the event.
• In the streets of Oakland, police shot a former Marine in the face at point-blank range, while he was penned in, and despite his having no weapon of any kind, posing no threat to anyone, and doing nothing of any kind in violation of any law. When he fell to the ground, gushing blood and good samaritans rushed to his aid, which not one of the police present did, an Oakland police officer fired a flash-bang grenade apparently loaded with tear gas directly into the huddle of people trying to help him, as if to finish off the protest with one last shot.
• At UC Davis, police walked along a row of nonviolent student protesters linking arms, and deployed a chemical weapon directly into their faces, with reckless and abject disregard for their health, their wellbeing, their rights, the rule of law or their own obligation to protect and serve.

In each case, the authorities behaved in direct contravention of the Constitution of the United States, and carried out brutal, wanton, physical assault against unarmed civilians. The violence against journalists in New York City is among the most worrying developments, because it suggests a depraved disregard for American law at the highest levels and directly mirrors the kind of planned atrocities being carried out in countries where corrupt regimes are actively trying to stamp out all pro-democracy protest.

In Egypt, the escalation of official violence against protesters has left 33 people dead since Saturday. The lesson of military impunity taught by Mayor Bloombergs assault on demonstrators has been learned, and is being treated almost as legal precedent by corrupt regimes unwilling to consent to any genuine open democratic process. The consequences are increased impunity, increased suffering, the deaths of innocents and an attempt across the region to roll back the democratic gains of the Arab spring.

People across the United States should stand together, regardless of party or ideology, and demand that there never again be even one instance of law enforcement being deployed to use force against any civilians exercising their basic rights.

- – -

Related:

• The Oakland Crackdown (discussion)
• What is the Meaning of This?
• Occupy Wall Street, with a People-centered Investment Bank

Robert Reich explains how big money is taking over the privileges of democratic rights, to the exclusion of ordinary people, and to the detriment of citizens who seek to exercise their basic civil liberties. The violence of police against unarmed civilians is absolutely inexcusable, and it is motivated in part by a systemic disregard for the value of the human individual, of basic rights, of citizenship and of the obligation public servants have to work for, not against, the people they are elected to serve. Says Reich: “WE NEED TO OCCUPY OUR DEMOCRACY.”

News emerging this morning from the battle-torn city of Sirte, hometown of ousted dictator Col. Muammar Qadhafi, suggested Qadhafi was wounded in battle, captured, and had died from his injuries. Al Jazeera quickly began broadcasting images of a body it said was Qadhafi’s. Images were then published showing a young Misratan TNC fighter brandishing a gold-plated handgun he says he took from Qadhafi when he captured him.

Throughout the afternoon, we have seen images of Qadhafi’s body spread across the internet and global media. There are conflicting accounts of what happened in the moments leading up to Qadhafi’s death, including claims by supporters he was killed by the Transitional forces, perhaps executed by a single shot from his own gold-plasted pistol, claims by the Transitional forces that he had been wounded in combat and died of his injuries, and still other claims that he had been accidentally killed by his own fighters.

Video this evening appears to show he was killed by a bullet wound to the head. CNN is reporting that he suffered, in addition to the fatal shot, two other shots to the head and neck and five shots to the back.

The town of Sirte is now in the hands of the revolutionary forces, and it now appears the fight is over. There are reports at least one of his sons was killed as well, and that another was injured. The Transitional National Council forces who captured Qadhafi say he was not executed, that they were transporting him to a hospital for treatment when he died.

There has been anticipation of his capture, along with a trial, an open hearing of four decades of crimes against his people.

The capture appears to have come in the wake of a NATO strike against a pro-Qadhafi convoy. The airstrike is reported to have included French fighter jets and a US “Predator” drone. There is speculation that the strike may have sent the top ranks of Qadhafi’s remaining loyalists into disarray, paving the way for the final seizure of Sirte by revolutionary forces.

As the images of Qadhafi’s bloodied corpse spread across the internet, spontaneous mass celebration spread across Libya. The people of Tripoli, so long held by and tormented by pro-Qadhafi forces, poured into the streets to celebrate the irreversible end of 42 years of brutal authoritarian rule. The new Libyan flag was visible in celebrations across the country, as hundreds of thousands of Libyans cheered the end of the Qadhafi era.

In the US, Sen. John McCain, the Republican rival to Pres. Obama in the 2008 election, said this evening “I’d like to congratulate the administration; they helped out enormously. I think that they deserve great credit. I think greater credit goes to our British and French allies, who really were leaders.” McCain lamented that the NATO campaign had not included “the full force of American airpower”. He then added, “The fact is this is another success for the Obama administration.”

Perhaps more importantly, the demise of Qadhafi showed the forces from Misrata and Benghazi working together to put an end to the pro-Qadhafi resistance, and as some commentators have noted, the rebels can now stop being rebels. The civil war in Libya is over, and the rebuilding of civil society, after four decades of cruel persecution, can proceed.

The above video shows the altercations leading up to the unprovoked macing of two women by an NYPD detective inspector, identified by online activists as Anthony Bologna, a finding confirmed by the NYPD itself. The incident has raised serious questions about what the planned response to the protests was, and whether there were orders in place for officers to intervene to halt the peaceful demonstrations. In the video, there are numerous incidents where individual officers, apparently acting in a disorganized and spontaneous fashion, physically strike, tackle, drag or pepper-spray unarmed civilians on a public street.

It is clear that police officers do heroic work in service of the public order, and that their active role in promoting the rule of law and keeping the peace is vital to the functioning of an open, democratic, civil society. But it is also clear that citizens cannot permit the justice system to be corrupted by undisciplined, unruly or even violent individuals who betray their uniform and their oath to serve and to protect the public. The NYPD is facing a decision, about whether to side with an absolute ban on unprovoked assaults of unarmed civilian bystanders legally entitled to both assemble and to use public streets for personal business or to condone the unjustified, unlawful physical assault of such persons by officers operating beyond their legal authority.

The choice is that stark, and the City of New York should make clear that there is no moral dilemma to consider: any unprovoked assault by an officer of the law against any unarmed civilian—including where the officer believed he was being forced to listen to uncomfortable words and slogans—must be treated as a violent, unprovoked assault, not as the lawful conduct of police business. All accused should be accorded appropriate due process, but unlawful physical violence against civilians cannot go unpunished if the rule of law and the integrity of the authorities of the City of New York are to be credible.

It is ultimately citizens, not agents of the government, who govern in the American system of democracy. It is citizens who have the higher standing before the law. Citizens are subject to reasonable prohibitions enacted in law, but so are law-enforcement officers. It is the law-enforcement officers whose freedom to act without deference to others is constrained by the Constitutional principle that only those powers specifically enumerated in the Constitution can accrue to the government.

No such provision exists for treating unarmed civilians as hostile combatants simply for walking on a public street, gathering to chant slogans, or discussing matters of controversy. In fact, numerous amendments to the Constitution specifically prohibit such actions by police.

The First Amendment guarantees the right to free assembly, to free expression and to petition the government for redress of grievances. For police to claim they were forced into violent acts because people expressed their views, gathered in public or voiced complaints about police activity, is as absurd as it is irrational. It is not a legal defense.

The Fourth Amendment protects the rights of all individuals against “unreasonable search and seizure”. Altercations in which police lay hands on unarmed civilians without legal just cause are incidents occurring outside the law, and which directly violate the Constitutional protection of civil liberties. Such incidents are an affront to due process and an abdication of any special authority under the law.

Any incident in which physical force is used to coerce behavior, coerce movement, retaliate for words spoken, or otherwise improperly seize control of the person or the property of any civilian, is an aggression against the citizens of the United States generally and against those individuals personally, and should be treated as a criminal act. We write with a spirit of genuine sympathy for the hard-working people of the NYPD, and for their normally world-leading professional service to the public. But we believe that as citizens, we all have a right to demand that no arm of our government ever be forced to undergo the shame and corruption of direct association with such unlawful behavior or such fundamentally undemocratic pretensions to unassigned powers.

The City of New York has an opportunity, provided by the nonviolent protest movement seeking to use purely peaceful, entirely lawful, strictly democratic means of protest, to show to the world what a genuinely stable, upstanding, and secure civil society does when there is widespread public dissatisfaction. The City of New York has an opportunity to show it stands with the people who comprise its body politic, the people who in fact govern and whose consent gives legitimacy to those who serve in government office.

The choice is clear: reprimand, suspend, investigate and punish—according to the evidence and the law—all acts of physical violence against unarmed civilians. Do this, and show deference to the rule of law, the virtues of a vibrant civil society, and the need for an active, informed citizenry. The soul of the City of New York is now on trial.

Today, the 20th of September, 2011, the discriminatory US military policy known as “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell”, which required thousands of gay personnel to serve their country while keeping their private life secret. Honorable people were discharged only because someone else found out they were not heterosexual. In some cases, the ideal military officer for a highly skilled, difficult-to-fill position were discharged despite being the most qualified person for operationally vital positions.

“The strength of America is her ability to undo her faults,” said Alexis de Tocqueville. For nearly two decades, the United States military has lived with a law that hampered its readiness, undermined the shared trust of its service members, and threatened to ruin the professional lives of some of its most committed and selfless patriots. From today, those committed professionals and selfless citizen volunteers, will be able to serve honorably, and openly, improving the readiness and excellence of our military.

The repeal of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell, ends a tragic example of prejudice ordained by federal law, and helps to restore the dignity and integrity of a nation of law, founded to uphold the equal, natural, universal rights, of all people.

The four coordinated hijackings, resulting in three deliberate attacks and one downed passenger jet, took 2,977 innocent lives and sowed fear and dismay across the world. They were acts of unconscionable evil intended to not only harm innocents and terrify the wider population, but to destabilize American democracy itself, and derail a people’s journey through history, possibly to erode its most virtuous contributions.

It was a clear, sunny morning and the first plane crashing into the North Tower of the World Trade Center had sparked a sustained global news flash, bringing hundreds of millions of eyes to the television footage. There was confusion and disbelief, and just as it was becoming clear there must have been a devastating loss of life, a massive fireball engulfed the top half of the South Tower, clearly signaling a deliberate terrorist attack was underway.

Less than 2 minutes later, the White House chief of staff told the president, then in a public event with schoolchildren, that “America is under attack.” A third plane flew into the Pentagon, headquarters of the US Dept. of Defense, while the fourth crashed into a field in Shanksville, Pennsylvania, after passengers reportedly made a fateful and heroic decision to rush the cockpit and take back the plane from the hijackers.

In the days after the attacks, it was often said such heinous acts would not be allowed to change our open, democratic culture or to reduce our commitment to moral leadership in the world. Pres. Bush made a visible, conscious effort to ask that no one treat Muslims or people of Arabic origin or descent, as anything other than members of an open, democratic society, as neighbors and possibly as victims, of the attacks.

But in the months and years that followed, the pressures and temptations inherent in legislating and prosecuting the war on terror drew the US federal government into planning and implementing policies that marked an appreciable and concerning detour away from many of our most cherished shared principles.

We have suffered, in the aftermath of the attacks, fully a decade of war. From the standpoint of an idealist democracy, or of just war theory, from the standpoint of a civilization committed to peaceful coexistence and negotiated outcomes, war is failure. It is the failure of peace, of the institutions of peaceful negotiation; it is the threat of a descent into chaos. War tests the moral fiber of a society more than any other experience.

In one of the most emotional and solemn of the speeches given to commemorate the legacy of those lost, Vice President Joseph Biden noted that “Never before in our history, has America asked so much over such a sustained period of an all volunteer force. I can say without fear of contradiction or being accused of exaggeration that the 9/11 generation ranks among the greatest our nation has ever produced.”

He spoke of 4,478 “fallen angels” who died in Iraq, another 1,648 who gave their lives in Afghanistan, over ten years, many of them in recent weeks, and the more than 40,000 wounded in both wars. Biden has visited the wounded soldiers many times, and said “I am awed not only by their capability, but by their sacrifices, today and every day.”

To this day, military strategists disagree about whether going to war as a response was a major strategic blunder. It was important, and positive, to oust the Taliban from power, to end the murderous regime of Saddam Hussein, but the unity and the worldwide human fabric of sympathy that grew immediately after the 9/11 attacks bled away as a politics of division and confrontation took hold.

Some professional politicians deliberately adopted the attacks as a “wedge issue”, and sought to paint rivals to their political philosophy or to their job security as enemies of the state. A naturally occurring sense of democratic, civic unity was replaced by a push for ideological uniformity. Many Americans began to feel, for the first time in their lives, as if dissent, or even critical thinking, was not welcome in the public discourse.

The very idea of engaged citizenship was challenged by a prevailing attitude of hardline politics, and for many, fear and suspicion. In retrospect, it may have been possible to depose the Taliban and to counter Al Qaeda, without ever going to war in Iraq, without adopting interrogation techniques borrowed from Cambodian death camps, and without giving in to the suspicion that due process was somehow a risky departure from the best service of justice in a free society.

In retrospect, there may have been better ways to channel the collective emotional upheaval that followed the attacks. Historians were already talking of how quickly the political capital of the moment was “squandered”, as less than two years after the attacks, an aggressive, unilateralist drive had totally overtaken American foreign policy. There was, for several years, a great risk that American democracy would be forever changed, and many of its most vital ideals eroded.

But today, in northern Virginia, Vice President Biden reminded us of something else: the attackers misunderstood the nature of the event they had planned and its likely impact on the nation they were targeting. While the risk was there that our culture could be comprehensively destabilized by the grief and anger that follow such an event, Biden suggested we were ultimately protected against that deviation by something Al Qaeda may never have understood:

With the fully restored Pentagon behind him, Biden intoned: “The true source of American power does not lie within that building, because as Americans, we draw our strength from the rich tapestry of our people.” He added that “The true legacy of 9/11 is that our spirit is mightier, the bonds that unite us are thicker, and the resolve is firmer than the millions of tons of limestone and concrete that make up that great edifice behind me.”

Biden explained the miscalculation of a small group of extremists who “never imagined” that the killing of 3,000 people would inspire 3,000,000 to volunteer for military service, to strengthen and defend a population of over 300,000,000. He spoke of the “sleeping giant” that was awakened by the shock and horror of the attacks. He was speaking not of a will to violence or retaliation, but of a spirit of aid to one’s fellow citizens.

In the hours after the attacks on New York City, a fleet of ferries, fishing boats, tug boats, small craft, commercial vessels and patrol boats, spontaneously gathered around lower Manhattan. The United States Coast Guard then sent out a message to “all available boats” to “report to Governor’s Island”. Hundreds of boats converged on the city to assist in the evacuation, arriving at what witnesses describe as astonishing speed.

After the North Tower collapsed into its footprint, engulfing lower Manhattan in a cloud of toxic dust, heat, smoke and debris, tens of thousands of evacuees—some injured, some in shock, many hysterical with panic, some just acting in service of those around them—were flooding the waterfront. Some were jumping into the water, despite the heavy boat traffic, desperate to get off the island and if possible swim to safety.

In what is now referred to as the great Manhattan “boatlift”, nearly 500,000 civilian refugees were evacuated in just nine hours. It was the largest evacuation by sea in history. By comparison, the legendary military evacuation of Dunkirk, during some of the darkest days of World War II, evacuated 350,000 French and British soldiers from France to Britain.

The great Manhattan boatlift was possible because conscientious citizen volunteers from across the region shot into action, heading into the unknowable dangers of an unprecedented disaster zone, risking their lives and livelihoods to help total strangers in desperate need. This was emblematic of a society infused with a strong sense of public trust and civic responsibility, where citizenship and shared destiny are implicit in our sense of who we are.

Ten years after the attacks of September 11, 2001, we have seen a spiritual recovery, in which people recognize that the values of such a society cannot be cast aside for any temporary sense of security. Our politics have seen a reversal, in which an unprecedented number of people voted, in 2008, for a politics of unity and civic engagement. And the hotly contested political campaigns have continued, with fevered disagreement over policy and ideology, but we can, perhaps say, that the freedom to disagree so vehemently is a celebration of the virtues of a free and open society.

Vice President Biden said to the families of victims today, “My prayer for you is that ten years later when you think of them, ten years later when you think of them, that it brings a smile to your lips instead of a pain in your heart.” There are many ways in which the legacy of the 9/11 attacks has long since been reclaimed from both the terrorists and the hardliners, and has come to inspire a commitment to service and shared responsibility.

Speaking of the bond between her family and the family of her brother’s great friend, coworker and fellow victim of the 9/11 attacks, Debra Epps today said, at the opening of the World Trade Center’s new 9/11 Memorial park, that the tragedy had brought the lesson that “People really do catch you, when you fall. It’s been a blessing.”

There are societies where unity in service of the civic space and one’s fellow citizens is a rare, if not unthinkable eventuality, and there are societies that are strong because free people naturally and voluntarily engage with each other with a sense of holding the civic space in trust, with a sense of commitment to the virtues and the vulnerabilities of their common humanity.

Ten years after the attacks of 9/11, the United States has been through many choices, many complexes of complicating choices, in response to the attacks. Many of those choices were controversial, and many have been reversed. Many curbs on civil liberties are still in place, and top officials disagree vehemently about whether there needs to be a trade-off between commitment to Constitutional protections of civil liberties and security.

Now, we enter a new period, in which withdrawal from Iraq and Afghanistan is already underway, a sometimes clumsy and always complicated process of nation-building is giving way to remote security actions, forceful “smart diplomacy” and a cooperative effort to prevent civil war in both countries. Osama bin Laden, and a number of “second-in-command” and “third-in-command” Al Qaeda operatives have been killed.

Some say the struggle against militant groups with “global reach” may be entering a more conscious deliberative phase, where the liberty-security tradeoff is not seen as being so economical. There is a hunger for reviving a less militaristic civic space, in which the cooperative voluntary citizenship of free people is the strength and the hope of a great democracy, in which the value of the service of millions of volunteers can be truly honored as an expression of their selflessness.

9/11 should, after this 10th anniversary, and in the aftermath of the deviation from and restoration of core values that we have undergone, become a national day of solemn recognition, collaborative restoration, and an affirmation of our civic space, in which citizenship is a sacred trust and human interest in the principal goal of our activity. It should be a day of national reflection and of the reaffirmation of the value of an open, democratic and voluntary civic space.

- – -

Cross-posted from Independents of Principle

Two days after taking control of most of the capital, and a day after two of Qadhafi’s sons escaped house arrest as pro-Qadhafi forces staged a challenge to the rebel onslaught, Libya’s pro-democracy rebels swept into Qadhafi’s compound in Tripoli. Reports from the Libyan capital spoke of scenes of rebels destroying images of Qadhafi and symbols of his regime, and seizing much of the extravagant wealth he had accumulated over four decades of authoritarian rule.

Beyond Libya’s borders, the capture of Qadhafi’s own main compound is being touted as the true collapse of his regime, though it has not yet brought word of outright surrender by his closest supporters. The whereabouts of Col. Qadhafi himself are as yet unknown, with reports and rumors suggesting he may be hiding in Tripoli itself, or that he may have fled to remote southern Libya, near the Chad border region.

There is also concern the pro-Qadhafi forces’ shelling of civilian areas in Tripoli and Misrata may cause some among the armed rebels to become more radical in the post-Qadhafi era. But the Transitional National Council has reiterated its intention to establish the rule of law, refrain from revenge-oriented actions, and prosecute regime leaders according to recognized standards of due process.

There is optimism that the fall of Bab al-Azizya—Qadhafi’s heavily fortified compound inside Tripoli, guarded by sharpshooters and special forces, and where he survived US airstrikes nearly three decades ago—to Libyan freedom fighters means Libya will see the end of the bloodshed of Qadhafi’s last days. But the mystery of Qadhafi’s whereabouts became all the more urgent this evening, when the missing leader reportedly broadcast a message, saying he would accept only victory or “martyrdom”.

Al Jazeera reported:

“After what we have seen today, after what Mahmoud Jibril (a leader of the rebel National Transitional Council) said, and the international recogntion of NTC as the legitimate representative of the Libyan people, it means that Gaddafi is now just a sought after criminal. The idea of Gaddafi as ‘the Libyan leader’, is over.

Meanwhile, 30 journalists remained holed up in Tripoli’s Rixos hotel on Tuesday. The New York Times reported that journalists from the BBC, CNN and other international news organisations were stuck inside the hotel with no electricity and described the hotel as a “prison”.

The capital is still very much a war zone, and pro-Qadhafi soldiers and mercenaries are reportedly threatening the lives of civilians and journalists, in an effort to hold onto the little terrain that has not been taken by the rebel forces. There had been rumors Qadhafi was holed up in a bunker beneath the Rixos Hotel, and there is concern the civilians inside the hotel might be in danger if they are not allowed to leave.

Seif al-Islam, Qadhafi’s 38-year old son, once thought of as a reformer and now a committed combattant fighting to defend his father’s dictatorship, said his father is safe and inside Tripoli. Observers have expressed skepticism about that possibility, and worry a prolonged manhunt could ensue, disrupting the potential for a peaceful transition to democracy. Others say Qadhafi should be treated as an international fugitive, to be arrested on sight, under indictment from the International Criminal Court, as soon as he emerges, wherever he emerges.

There was also fighting reported today in Ajelat, and in Ageila, along the coast outside Ras Lanuf, a key oil facility. It was reported that Qadhafi loyalists were attacking Ajelat with missiles and tanks and that scud missiles were fired from Sirte, Qadhafi’s hometown, toward Misrata, a city besieged by Qadhafi for four months, and only recently liberated by the rebel forces.

The morning after Tripoli fell to rebel forces, Mustafa Abdel Jalil, leader of the Transitional National Council, has called on all Libyans to coexist peacefully, and to respect the rule of law, as the war comes to a close. Abdel Jalil said there will be no street justice, and that regime figures will be tried fairly in a court of law. He called for restraint and “self control” and respect “for the lives and properties of others”, and an atmosphere of cooperation in rebuilding civil society.

There has been concern that after 6 months of war, which began when Qadhafi’s regime began full-scale military assaults on crowds of unarmed civilian protesters, elements in the rebel movement might begin to carry out vigilante attacks against former supporters of the regime. Mustafa Abdel Jalil, who defected when Qadhafi ordered the killing of protesters, has said, however, that the rebel movement is committed to a peaceful transition to democracy and to the rule of law.

The leader of the interim Libyan government gave the following statement:

“During the last few days the revolutionaries in Tripoli have really proved that they are the revolutionaries of the capital. And that the calls for Tripoli to be our capital were rightful calls.

“Muammar Gaddafi will be remembered and his period of rule through the acts that he committed against the rebels and the world. From political assassinations, arrests and mind games. And oppressing all the efforts of the Libyan people to oust him since the first year of his revolution. There were many, many attempts to oust Gaddafi. The Libyan people never submitted to Gaddafi, since the first year of the revolution..or, rather, since the first year of the coup.

“But God has chosen that Gaddafi’s end should be at the hands of these youths, so that they can join the Arab Spring that is going around the Arab nations.

“And now I say with all transparency that the era of Gaddafi is over.

“Libyans must realise that the coming period will not be a bed of roses. We face many challenges and we have many responsibilities. Beginning with healing the wounds and putting our hands in one another’s. All this in loyalty to the blood of our martyrs. And to the principles tat this revolution was created for: creating safety, security, peace and prosperity. These principles can only be achieved through reconciliation, forbearance and tolerance.

“All of this will be done after we put the finishing touches and we identify those who are responsible for acts in Libya.

“Therefore I call upon all Libyans to practice self control and to protect the lives and properties of others.”

The whereabouts of Col. Qadhafi are, at present, unknown. He has been referred to the International Criminal Court for prosecution on charges of war crimes and crimes against humanity, and there are reports of fierce fighting still in the area around his main compound in the capital. Rebels now control as much as 85% to 90% of the territory inside Tripoli.

Throughout the night, they took more territory, and there is now video showing rebels storming into the home of Qadhafi’s daughter. There was also a dramatic phone interview last night, after his son Mohammed surrendered, in which gunfire is heard and he says repeatedly “They are inside my house”, before the line cuts off.

Across the world, there have been celebrations, as Libyan exiles and émigrés marked the fall of Qadhafi’s regime by gathering in public squares and outside government buildings, in London, in Australia, in Washington. In front of the White House, Libyans chanted “Libya is free” and “Thank you, Obama”. One Libyan celebrating the fall of Tripoli waved a green, red and black rebel flag, with the words “Thank you, NATO! Thank you, Obama!” across it.

According to Al Jazeera’s reporting:

The mother of two, who arrived in the US in 1984 with her brothers and sisters after receiving political asylum, also had kind words for France, which was among the first countries to call for international intervention in Libya.

“We want to say thank you to President Nicolas Sarkozy and the French people who were the first, even before the Americans, to support the Libyans in their struggle,” she said.

Al Jazeera reported overnight:

Euphoric Libyan rebels have moved into the centre of the capital, Tripoli, as Muammar Gaddafi’s defenders melted away and thousands of jubilant civilians rushed out of their homes to cheer the long convoys of pickup trucks packed with fighters shooting in the air.

The rebels’ surprising and speedy leap forward, after six months of largely deadlocked civil war, was packed into just a few dramatic hours. By nightfall on Sunday, they had advanced more than 32km to Tripoli.

Zeina Khodr, Al Jazeera’s correspondent, said from the Green Square: “There’s a party in the Libyan capital tonight. The people are in charge of the city. They’ve decided the square is now called Martyrs’ Square, the original name. They’re shouting ‘We’re free’ and shooting at a poster of Gaddafi.”

Skirmishes continue, however, with the BBC reporting tanks and heavy artillery under the control of Qadhafi’s military commanders are still holding key positions inside the capital. Even as the world appears unified in celebrating the fall of the four-decades-long regime, there are concerns that further fighting could lead to deaths and revenge killings. The Transitional National Council is now working to coordinate an official takeover of security operations across the nation, even as some cities have not yet recognized its authority.

More reporting on the Libyan liberation movement:

• Libyan Rebels Capture Qadhafi Son, Enter Tripoli (video) – updates - Aug. 21, 2011
• Qadhafi Under Siege as Rebels Move into Tripoli – updates - Aug. 20, 2011
• Libyan Rebels Advance on Tripoli, Take Key Cities - Aug. 20, 2011
• US Now Recognizes Transitional Council as Legitimate Libyan Government - July 15, 2011
• Qadhafi Regime Abuse of al-Obeidi Crime Against Humanity - Apr. 4, 2011
• UN Action in Libya is Bid to Rescue Democracy Movement - Mar. 27, 2011
• Airstrikes Underway Against Libya, as Qadhafi Refuses to Pull Back - Mar. 19, 2011
• UN Security Council Votes to Support Strikes Against Qadhafi - Mar. 17, 2011
• Qadhafi ‘has lost the legitimacy to rule’ - Feb. 27, 2011
• Protesters in Central Tripoli Fired on by Irregular Army Loyal to Qadhafi - Feb. 26, 2011
• Ban calls for action to stop Qadhafi killing… - Feb. 26, 2011
• Qadhafi Declares War on His People - Feb. 25, 2011
• Qadhafi Regime on Brink of Collapse - Feb. 22, 2011
• Qadhafi’s Son Warns of Civil War, as Libyan Military Appears Split - Feb. 21, 2011
• Violent Crackdown in Libya; Bahrain Protesters Take Pearl Square - Feb. 20, 2011
• Qadhafi Crackdown Has Killed at Least 84 - Feb. 19, 2011
• Spirit of Democratic Revolution Spreads Across Mideast - Feb. 15, 2011

UPDATE: Rebel forces have taken much of Tripoli, celebrate with civilians in Green Square and control the Tripoli airport

Reports from Tripoli, the capital of Libya, suggest rebel forces have taken territory inside the capital, and captured one of Qadhafi’s sons, after a top security official ordered troops to lay down arms and let the rebels in. There are reports of convoys of rebel soldiers moving into the capital, being welcomed and celebrated by unarmed civilians. Some news reports have talked of “uprisings” in the suburbs, and possibly within Tripoli itself.

According to Reuters:

In a coordinated revolt that rebels have been secretly planning for months to end Gaddafi’s 41-year rule, shooting started on Saturday night across Tripoli moments after Muslim clerics, using the loudspeakers of mosque minarets, called people on to the streets.

The fighting inside Tripoli, combined with rebel advances into the outskirts of the city, appeared to signal the decisive phase in a six-month conflict that has become the bloodiest of the “Arab Spring” uprisings and embroiled NATO powers.

A source inside the regime reportedly told Reuters that 376 people were killed, on both sides, in overnight clashes inside the capital. In the village of al-Maya, pro-Qadhafi forces reportedly clashed with the rebels, who took the town, painted the walls to declare their presence and their march to Tripoli, then continued with the convoys flowing into the capital.

According to CNN and the Baltimore Sun:

Tripoli, Libya (CNN) — Saif al-Islam Gadhafi, a son of Libya’s ruler Moammar Gadhafi and a top official in the regime, has been captured by opposition forces, a rebel official said Sunday night.

Ali Said, general secretary of the Benghazi-based Transitional National Council, said that the arrest had taken place in Tripoli. The head of the same rebel group also confirmed the capture in an Al Jazeera interview. There was no immediate reaction from Libyan government officials to the report.

Al Jazeera English reported, on its Libya Live Blog this evening, that one of Qadhafi’s sons, Mohammed, “has surrendered” to the rebels. That marks the closest any of the top-level defections has come so far to Qadhafi himself. With two of his sons now in custody, and his family apparently splitting over whether to fight or surrender, it is expected Qadhafi himself may attempt to negotiate his own surrender.

But Muammar Qadhafi has been defiant, stating as recently as this morning that he would “fight to the end”. This evening he repeated calls for residents of Tripoli and other cities to rush to his defense and to fight the rebel “rats”.

On Twitter, the news is pouring in, with anecdotal reports mixing with video, audio and official news reports. @ArabRevolution posted this re-tweet: “RT @LibyanLion17 AJA Caller – BREAKING – NATO is taking out the walls of Bab alAziziya so that FFs can move in. #Libya #Feb17 #Tripoli“. (“FF” has become Twitter code for freedom fighter.)

@LibyanLion17 posted this update around the same time: “BREAKING – Saadi, Mohammed and Saif al-Islam have ALL been captured by FF. 4 more to go. #Libya #Feb17 #Tripoli“, around 6:00 pm EDT, midnight in Tripoli. Less than half an hour later, reports broke that Muammar Qadhafi himself had fled the country and was in hiding in Algeria. That report has not been confirmed, and NATO’s secretary general was unable to answer questions about whether Qadhafi had left Libya or not.

- – -

UPDATES

At 12:01 am, 1:01 am Monday, Tripoli time, London’s Guardian newspaper reports:

Tripoli resident Hakeem Guja has told the BBC: “We celebrate the victory. The people are very happy and want to thank the Nato forces for helping us.”

A few minutes before 1:00 am, Tripoli time, @LibyanLion17 tweeted “BREAKING – ALJAZEERA – THERE IS NEWS THAT GADDAFI HIMSELF HAS BEEN CAUGHT #Libya #Feb17 #Tripoli“. But Al Jazeera reported only minutes later that “The ICC has confirmed that Saif al-Islam Gaddafi has been detained, and NOT his father, Muammar Gaddafi.”

The BBC is reporting the International Criminal Court has confirmation that at least one of Qadhafi’s sons, Saif al Islam, has been taken into custody. CNN’s Ben Wedeman tweeted, also shortly after 1:00 am Tripoli time: “When the Rixos minders run away, it means the regime has given up on trying to mold the message. Game over. #Libya #Feb17“.

(1:11 am, Tripoli) From the Guardian’s Libya Live Blog:

12.11am: The International Criminal Court prosecutor’s spokeswoman says it has been confirmed that Gaddafi’s son Saif al-Islam has been detained, Reuters reports.

12.09am: The Libyan rebels reach Green Square in the centre of Tripoli, Sky News reports.

The US State Dept. is urging Libya’s rebels, and the governing authority under the Transitional National Council, to begin planning for the post-Qadhafi period. According to Reuters:

“Clearly the offensive for Tripoli is under way,” State Department spokesperson Victoria Nuland said in a statement.

“We continue efforts to encourage the TNC to maintain broad outreach across all segments of Libyan society and to plan for post-Gaddafi Libya. Gaddafi’s days are numbered. If Gaddafi cared about the welfare of the Libyan people, he would step down now.”

A spokesman for the Council, which has been recognized as Libya’s legitimate governing authority, said in recent days that mistakes had been made in the early days after rebel takeovers in the east, and that a plan for secure, non-violent government would be in place once Tripoli falls.

Shortly after 1:00 am, Tripoli time, Reuters reported the rebels had reached Green Square. Other reports suggested the fighting there had ceased and civilians were welcoming the rebels.

At 1:42 am, Tripoli time, Al Jazeera English reported that the rebels had taken control of the Tripoli airport. There have been intermittent reports that fighting had ceased, but news continues to pour in of skirmishes, rebel advances, with no clear sign the regime has fallen, but no clear sign of a forceful ongoing resistance. At 1:44 am, Tripoli time, AJE reported that Libyan state television is “blacked out”, not active.

Reports from journalists in Tripoli that regime “minders” had fled have been taken as a suggestion that the regime is no longer actively seeking to fight the rebel offensive or control the media message. There are rumors the rebels seek to detain fleeing government officials at the Tripoli airport, but no confirmed reports at present of top-level detentions there.

1:48 am Tripoli time: Libya’s ambassador to the UAE (representing the Transitional National Council) tells AJE there is an atmosphere of “jubilation and relief” as cities across Libya celebrate what appears to be the last night of the Qadhafi regime. He said the transitional stabilization team was working to build a non-violent democratic transition process “according to the best practices of stabilization and reconstruction work”.

The ambassador also pledge that there would be no campaign of vengeance against former loyalists or loyalist enclaves and specified that a peaceful post-war was necessary to ensure that the “suffering and pain of so many Libyans and Libyan families does not go in vain”. There are reports at this hour of contacts between US and European officials and representatives of the transitional Libyan government regarding ways to manage the peace.

At 1.59 am, Tripoli time, ThinkProgress posted this report on Twitter: “RT @Reuters: REBELS SAY ALL TRIPOLI IS UNDER THEIR CONTROL EXCEPT GADDAFI’S STRONGHOLD OF BAB AL-AZIZIYAH”.

Representatives of the rebel movement say the Transitional National Council will replace the Qadhafi-era name Green Square with Martyrs’ Square, in honor of the Libyan democracy advocates who died fighting to defend civilian populations against the regime.

2:04 am: @SultanAlQassemi, commentator on Arab affairs, tweets: “Al Jazeera: Sources: Libyan Revolutionaries have taken control of the State TV & Radio building in Tripoli #Libya“. The capture of state media is being treated as an important development for the democracy movement, as Egyptian protest leaders have expressed concern they have not been able to better guide the public debate in the post-Mubarak era.

Unconfirmed cell-phone images are now emerging purporting to show celebrations in the streets of Tripoli.

2:14 am: There are reports on CNN that regime snipers are still holding key positions inside Tripoli, even as rebel forces are said to be holding all territory surrounding Qadhafi’s compound. A statement has been made suggesting the compound is now being seen by rebels as “a five-star prison” for Qadhafi, if he remains inside. There is no confirmed information in the global media about whether clashes continue at the site of Qadhafi’s compound.

11:45 pm EDT, 5:45 am in Tripoli: Al Jazeera is now reporting:

Euphoric Libyan rebels have moved into the centre of the capital, Tripoli, as Muammar Gaddafi’s defenders melted away and thousands of jubilant civilians rushed out of their homes to cheer the long convoys of pickup trucks packed with fighters shooting in the air.

The rebels’ surprising and speedy leap forward, after six months of largely deadlocked civil war, was packed into just a few dramatic hours. By nightfall on Sunday, they had advanced more than 32km to Tripoli.

Zeina Khodr, Al Jazeera’s correspondent, said from the Green Square: “There’s a party in the Libyan capital tonight. The people are in charge of the city. They’ve decided the square is now called Martyr’s Square, the original name. They’re shouting ‘we’re free’ and shooting at a poster of Gaddafi.”

11:17 am EDT, 5:17 am in Tripoli: Update from Mother Jones’ Hamed Aleaziz and Asawin Suebsaeng:

Deborah Haynes, an editor at London-based newspaper The Times, is on the ground in Tripoli. Haynes just sent out an unsettling tweet, indicating that the battle for Tripoli may be far from over: “Just been in Green Square. Gunfire erupted, sending rebels scattering. Then saw eight fresh corpses on way out. Tripoli ain’t secure.”

Also, Sarah Sidner, a reporter for CNN, tweeted around 5:15 a.m. Monday in Tripoli that “Green square nearly empty. We were warned to get out. Rebels say Gadhafi troops advancing toward square.”

12:03 am EDT, 6:03 am in Tripoli: The BBC is reporting there are fierce battles raging in the area around the Tripoli Hotel, where the Qadhafi regime has been basing its media operations. Al Libya TV is reportedly offline, but pro-Qadhafi forces are defending the Tripoli Hotel, and there are reports Qadhafi spokespeople claim as many as 35,000 troops may be in and around the capital, “ready to fight” to fend off the rebels.

The Transitional National Council has said rebels will not occupy the city militarily, if Qadhafi and his family leave power.

12:35 am EDT, 6:35 am in Tripoli: US president Barack Obama has called on Col. Muammar Qadhafi to “relinquish power once and for all.” He added that “Qadhafi and his regime need to recognize that their rule has come to an end”. He said “The future of Libya is now in the hands of the Libyan people,” and said the US would work closely with the Transitional National Council, which it recognizes as the legitimate governing authority.

Obama went on to say that “We will continue to insist that the basic rights of the Libyan people are respected. We will continue to work with our allies and partners in the international community to protect the people of Libya, and to support a peaceful transition to democracy.”

12:49 am EDT, 6:49 am in Tripoli: Al Jazeera English Live, tweeting as @AJELive, reports: “Nasser, #Tripoli resident, says they will let NTC take care of anything, are forming local security battalions, won’t take revenge #Libya“. Reports suggesting rebels are ready to establish law and order and to institute a transition guided by the rule of law are winning encouragement, and optimism that the six-month Libyan war may be ending.

More reporting on the Libyan liberation movement:

• Qadhafi Under Siege as Rebels Move into Tripoli – updates - Aug. 20, 2011
• Libyan Rebels Advance on Tripoli, Take Key Cities - Aug. 20, 2011
• US Now Recognizes Transitional Council as Legitimate Libyan Government - July 15, 2011
• Qadhafi Regime Abuse of al-Obeidi Crime Against Humanity - Apr. 4, 2011
• UN Action in Libya is Bid to Rescue Democracy Movement - Mar. 27, 2011
• Airstrikes Underway Against Libya, as Qadhafi Refuses to Pull Back - Mar. 19, 2011
• UN Security Council Votes to Support Strikes Against Qadhafi - Mar. 17, 2011
• Qadhafi ‘has lost the legitimacy to rule’ - Feb. 27, 2011
• Protesters in Central Tripoli Fired on by Irregular Army Loyal to Qadhafi - Feb. 26, 2011
• Ban calls for action to stop Qadhafi killing… - Feb. 26, 2011
• Qadhafi Declares War on His People - Feb. 25, 2011
• Qadhafi Regime on Brink of Collapse - Feb. 22, 2011
• Qadhafi’s Son Warns of Civil War, as Libyan Military Appears Split - Feb. 21, 2011
• Violent Crackdown in Libya; Bahrain Protesters Take Pearl Square - Feb. 20, 2011
• Qadhafi Crackdown Has Killed at Least 84 - Feb. 19, 2011
• Spirit of Democratic Revolution Spreads Across Mideast - Feb. 15, 2011

After 42 years in power, ruling throughout with authoritarian force, the regime of Muammar Qadhafi now appears to be falling. Abandoned by the international community, his top commanders defecting, and reports his troops have laid down their arms and fled, the rebel forces are now reportedly moving into the capital Tripoli.

Al Jazeera is now reporting that “Gaddafi forces shrink on all battle fronts”. According to the Arabic-language news service:

At a news conference, Bani said rebels captured the city of Zlitan, 140km southeast of Tripoli, after more than two months of fighting.

“Zlitan is now completely liberated after a severe fight, and for the first time I can say we have control over it,” Bani told reporters on Saturday.

As rebels battled for towns on either side of Tripoli on Saturday, fighting spilled across the border into Tunisia, where Libyan infiltrators clashed with Tunisian troops.

Tunisian security sources said their forces intercepted Libyan men in vehicles with weapons and fought them through the night in the desert. They reported several casualties.

With the opposition now controlling Misrata, Az Zawiyah, Zlitan, Gharyan, and most of the key port city of Brega, while governing much of the country from Benghazi, rebel forces have reportedly taken control of Tajoura, a suburb to the east of the capital. The rebels have also reportedly cut off supply routes from Tunisia, along the coast and from the east of the country, a key tactical achievement to lay the groundwork for an offensive against Qadhafi’s forces, after months of combat.

- – -

UPDATES

Posted 11:20 pm EDT—From thepoliticalnotebook:

Reports on Twitter regarding Libya are moving very quickly. The front in Zawiya is moving to Tripoli as the fighters plan for an early morning offensive. There are reports, confirmed by Richard Engel of NBC, that there is fighting in the city itself.

Follow the Al Jazeera live blog, which is beginning to update more attentively.

Posted 11:22 pm EDT—From Al Jazeera English:

Head of the Political affairs of the NTC, Fathi Baja, told Reuters:

“There is certain information tells that forces loyal to Gaddafi withdrew and left their weapons behind in areas outside Tripoli. And I think everything is in order in Tripoli, rebels are approaching al-Sareem Street nearby Bab al-Azizia complex.

Gaddafi may be coerced to flee if he managed to co-ordinate it with some countries, but I hope to arrest him to be tried with his sons and his assistants in Libya”

Posted 11:25 pm EDT—From Al Jazeera Live Blog Libya:

Bashir Sewehli, a Libyan activist, tells Al Jazeera that the clashes in Tripoli are still ongoing.

“The military airport is under control of the rebels, and there are other areas in and around Tripoli as well. The rebels are wating for reinforcements.

The news has not been coming through because of the fighting, but we will know more in the next coming hours. The rebel fighters that I have spoken to said they will not go home until this is over.

Most of the people involved in this fight against Gaddafi troops are only civilians.”

- – -

More reporting on the Libyan liberation movement:

• Libyan Rebels Advance on Tripoli, Take Key Cities - Aug. 20, 2011
• US Now Recognizes Transitional Council as Legitimate Libyan Government - July 15, 2011
• Qadhafi Regime Abuse of al-Obeidi Crime Against Humanity - Apr. 4, 2011
• UN Action in Libya is Bid to Rescue Democracy Movement - Mar. 27, 2011
• Airstrikes Underway Against Libya, as Qadhafi Refuses to Pull Back - Mar. 19, 2011
• UN Security Council Votes to Support Strikes Against Qadhafi - Mar. 17, 2011
• Qadhafi ‘has lost the legitimacy to rule’ - Feb. 27, 2011
• Protesters in Central Tripoli Fired on by Irregular Army Loyal to Qadhafi - Feb. 26, 2011
• Ban calls for action to stop Qadhafi killing… - Feb. 26, 2011
• Qadhafi Declares War on His People - Feb. 25, 2011
• Qadhafi Regime on Brink of Collapse - Feb. 22, 2011
• Qadhafi’s Son Warns of Civil War, as Libyan Military Appears Split - Feb. 21, 2011
• Violent Crackdown in Libya; Bahrain Protesters Take Pearl Square - Feb. 20, 2011
• Qadhafi Crackdown Has Killed at Least 84 - Feb. 19, 2011
• Spirit of Democratic Revolution Spreads Across Mideast - Feb. 15, 2011

After six months of fighting, the Libyan rebel forces, representing the pro-demcoracy movement that came under military attack by 42-year dictator Muammar Qadhafi, are reportedly advancing on the capital Tripoli. Since the fighting began, the rebels’ Transitional National Council has won support from world powers, the international community and ultimately the United Nations, as the official governing and diplomatic authority for Libya. Now, an isolated Qadhafi looks likely to lose power in the coming weeks or months.

According to the New York Times:

With unexpected swiftness, the ill-trained and ill-equipped rebels from the western mountains this week overtook much of the strategic coastal town of Zawiyah, with its enormous oil refinery, just 30 miles west of Tripoli. By Saturday morning, there were reports that they controlled it completely.

They had also taken Gharyan, an important outpost along the trade route to the south. And a correspondent for the Arab news network Al Jazeera in the town of Zlitan, a crucial Qaddafi barracks town east of Tripoli, reported that it too had fallen to the rebels. Qaddafi troops had concentrated in all three towns, and their retreat in the face of the amateurish rebels raised new doubts about the will and cohesion of the loyalist forces.

Recent weeks have seen a wave of defections from Qadhafi’s inner circle, as top officials orchestrated their escape from Libya, with their families. The focus is now shifting to Tripoli, where rebels hope to capitalize on their gathering momentum and swiftly end the war.

The main roads supplying Tripoli have now been cut off by the rebel advance. After months of rapidly increasing food prices, the city is now reportedly beginning to experience a siege culture, with reports of waits for gasoline of more than a week, civil services shutting down, garbage uncollected, police missing and a spreading crime wave.

Many are reportedly looking for ways to escape the capital, for fear of a bloody fight to end the Qadhafi regime. Qadhafi and his family had repeatedly vowed to exterminate populations that abandoned him, and barring some unexpected development, are expected to wage a battle of attrition to hold onto power. There are reports of ongoing behind the scenes pressure from the rebels, and possibly from foreign governments to urge Qadhafi’s military leaders to lay down arms.

With rebels now controlling most of the territory of Zawiyah, where the fighting remains fierce, reports suggest NATO bombing is being coordinated, both in the towns recently taken and in the capital Tripoli—where key regime buildings have been under bombardment—to help the rebels advance. The rebel strategy seems to be to take and hold the cities of Zawiyah, Zlitan, Gharyan and Brega, then to close in on the capital and take control of the military and government command structure.

- – -

More reporting on the Libyan liberation movement:

• US Now Recognizes Transitional Council as Legitimate Libyan Government - July 15, 2011
• Qadhafi Regime Abuse of al-Obeidi Crime Against Humanity - Apr. 4, 2011
• UN Action in Libya is Bid to Rescue Democracy Movement - Mar. 27, 2011
• Airstrikes Underway Against Libya, as Qadhafi Refuses to Pull Back - Mar. 19, 2011
• UN Security Council Votes to Support Strikes Against Qadhafi - Mar. 17, 2011
• Qadhafi ‘has lost the legitimacy to rule’ - Feb. 27, 2011
• Protesters in Central Tripoli Fired on by Irregular Army Loyal to Qadhafi - Feb. 26, 2011
• Ban calls for action to stop Qadhafi killing… - Feb. 26, 2011
• Qadhafi Declares War on His People - Feb. 25, 2011
• Qadhafi Regime on Brink of Collapse - Feb. 22, 2011
• Qadhafi’s Son Warns of Civil War, as Libyan Military Appears Split - Feb. 21, 2011
• Violent Crackdown in Libya; Bahrain Protesters Take Pearl Square - Feb. 20, 2011
• Qadhafi Crackdown Has Killed at Least 84 - Feb. 19, 2011
• Spirit of Democratic Revolution Spreads Across Mideast - Feb. 15, 2011

Pres. Barack Obama, who with Sec. of State Hillary Rodham Clinton has managed a complex array of shifting diplomatic relations throughout the developing democratic awakening across the Arabic-speaking world, yesterday demanded that Syria’s authoritarian leader Bashar al-Assad relinquish power. Assad has engaged in five months of full-scale military attacks on unarmed pro-democracy demonstrators.

Obama and Clinton have been diligently working to build a global “coalition of condemnation” of the Syrian regime’s brutal crackdown of peaceful protest. Working to win support from China and Russia is crucial, because Assad’s regime benefits from trade with both nations, and substantive action to move Syria into a peaceful transition to democracy will require UN Security Council support for the democracy movement.

With Russia and China agreeing to the US and European demand that Syria end its military assault on demonstrators, Obama was able to say that only the hardline regime in Iran—which also used extreme violence to suppress a pro-democracy protest movement—continues to support Assad. That support for the demand to halt military operations, however, does not equate to a Russian or Chinese agreement that Assad should step down.

Today, Russia expressed opposition to the effort to force Assad to leave power. It is not clear if this opposition would translate into a vote to oppose official UN sanctions or whether the opposition would hold up if Assad continues the slaughter of unarmed civilians.

The government says its troops have pulled out of key cities where the protest movement has swelled its ranks. But protesters in Hama and elsewhere say live fire attacks are ongoing and the Syrian military continues to attack unarmed protesters and civilian bystanders. There are reports at least 17 civilians have been killed by Assad’s security forces today alone, even as he tells the international community he has halted military operations against civilians.

Hundreds of thousands of Syrian citizens are reportedly now planning to stage yet another massive protest against the Assad regime, which will soon see revenues declining as new sanctions take hold. The protest movement originally called for reform, but not the ouster of Bashar al-Assad. Assad’s reaction, using lethal force consistently, and over an ever wider area across the nation, killing literally thousands of his own people, has led to the demand that he resign and leave power.

The Syrian protest movement has asked foreign nations not to intervene militarily, because they want their movement to have the legitimacy of a non-violent protest movement. But spokespeople for the movement say the protesters support diplomatic opposition to Assad’s government and sanctions designed to cut off oil and gas revenues that flow to the ministry of defense, which is engaged in full-blown military operations against unarmed civilian demonstrators.

Syria may be the next of the pro-democracy protest nations to set up a transitional democratic council, to oversee an orderly transition to democracy. This has been done in Libya and in Yemen. The Libyan Transitional National Council has won international recognition as the official legitimate authorities in Libya, after Qadhafi military officers defected, explaining the dictator hard ordered ballistic missile strikes against crowds of demonstrators and Qadhafi himself threatened to annihilate the population of Benghazi, taking every man woman and child from their homes.

The Yemeni transitional council has not yet won support from the international community though there is talk that if Pres. Saleh—currently receiving medical treatment outside the country—does not follow through on his three pledges to step down, he may be detained, in favor of a coordinated effort to support the pro-democracy movement’s transitional governing authority.

Wisconsin is holding six recall elections tonight in response to popular petition to unseat Republican state senators who supported Gov. Walker’s plan to strip public servants of their collective bargaining rights. Each of the six Republican incumbents occupy senate seats representing districts drawn by Republicans to ensure Republican victories, so any victory represents a significant shift in party preference.

The Democrats need to win three seats in order to take control of the state Senate, and deal a serious blow to Gov. Walker and his allies in the state legislature.

As of 10:02 local time, the Republicans had saved three seats:

• In District 2, Sen. Robert Cowles defeated Nancy Nusbaum—59%-41% (94% reporting).
• In District 10, Sen. Sheila Harsdorf fought off the challenger Shelly Moore—58%-42%.
• In District 14, Sen. Luther Olson defeated Fred Clark—52%-48%.

In the other three races, the story was more favorable to the Democratic challengers:

• In the 32nd district, challenger Jennifer Shilling was leading incumbent Dan Kapanke by 8 percentage points.
• Incumbent Randy Hopper was leading Jessica King by 2, separated by just 500 votes, with King’s base of support in Osh Kosh yet to report.
• But most significantly, Walker ally Alberta Darling—for whom Republican supporters and outside groups spent at least $8 million—was trailing Sandy Pasch by 8%, though there were still some very favorable areas for Darling yet to report.

Just a few minutes later, with 87% reporting, Jessica King had pulled ahead of Randy Hopper by 137 votes.

At 10:08 pm, Democrat Jennifer Shilling became the first challenger to unseat one of the recalled Republicans. John Nichols noted that Dan Kapanke was elected during the Obama landslide election year, and has been removed for office after voting to strip public servants of their organizing rights.

The race between Pasch and Darling shifted quickly, as Pasch first widened her lead, then ceded ground, leaving the race too close to call:

• By 10:11 pm, Sandy Pasch was holding her lead over Alberta Darling by a margin of 55% to 45%, and King and Hopper remained too close to call.
• By 10:18 pm local time, with 57% of the votes counted, Pasch was leading Darling by a margin of 58% to 42%.
• But just two minutes later, with the latest reports showing 63% reporting, Darling had closed the gap to 51% to 49%.

At 10:20 pm, Jessica King was leading incumbent Randy Hopper by less than 200 votes, with 87% of the votes counted. There are concerns that irregularities that occurred during state Supreme Court elections earlier this year might be repeated in some pro-Republican areas. Observers have suggested a Pasch win would be a major defeat for the Republicans, while local Democratic organizers remained confident King would pull ahead of Hopper when the number from Osh Kosh came in.

At 10:30 pm local time, Pasch was holding her lead over Darling, 51% to 49%, leading by a margin of fewer than 1,000 votes.

At 10:38 pm, with 97% of precincts reporting, Jessica King was leading Randy Hopper by 27,123 votes to 25,951—51% to 49%. In District 8, with 67% of precincts reporting, Pasch was leading Darling 52% to 48%, by a reported margin of roughly 1,200 votes.

At 10:39 pm Wisconsin time, in District 18, Jessica King was named the projected winner, becoming the second Democrat to unseat a Republican state senator for supporting Gov. Walker’s anti-union agenda.

- – - 

Suspicion of irregularities: Shortly before 11:00 pm local time, with 68% reporting from District 8, Sandy Pasch was still leading Alberta Darling by a margin of 51% to 49%, but the vote counting reportedly stopped.

Think Progress is reporting that Waukesha County would be providing no further results for at least an hour. The announcement is reminiscent of what has occurred in multiple past elections, where similar stalls in the release of vote counts immediately preceded the “discovery” of new votes that swung a tight election toward the Republican candidate.

The county clerk, Kathy Nickolaus has become known for her involvement in these alleged irregularities, and tonight there has been fast and furious criticism of her handling of elections, her party’s tolerance of what is seen as a deeply flawed track record, and of what appear to be new irregularities.

At this hour, there are mounting concerns that a county official with a history of being involved in irregularities that shift the vote toward the Republican party might interfere with the integrity of the election. One Wisconsin member of the House of Representatives called on the United States Dept. of Justice to investigate the irregularities that took place earlier this year.

With the history of manipulations, allegations of criminal election fraud, and the balance of power in the Wisconsin state Senate at risk, it is suspected that irregularities may be in the works. Democratic State Sen. Jon Erpenbach said it was “ridiculous” that the local county officials stalled the count, because they are using the exact same machines used throughout the state.

At 11:12 pm local time, the news broke that with 79% of local precincts reporting, the incumbent Alberta Darling had taken the lead, by a margin of 52% to 48% over challenger Sandy Pasch. At 11:19, with 80% reporting, Darling widened her lead to 53% to 47%.

Sen. Erpenbach expressed concern about the integrity of the election process in Waukesha County. Mike Tate, chairman of the Wisconsin Democratic party, issued a statement shortly after the sudden swing to Darling, suggesting there is now evidence of election tampering and a serious need for a closer look at what has taken place at the county clerk’s office in Waukesha County.

- – -

At 11:31 pm local time, with 82% of precincts reporting, Darling was leading 53% to 47%. After the back and forth swings throughout the evening, the consistent 53% to 47% reporting sparked still more suspicion of irregularities.

— Wednesday, August 10, 2011 —

At 12:36 am, local time, the AP called the election for Alberta Darling, with observers split over whether the recall election had been conducted legally. In Waukesha County, the county clerk has been accused of manipulating the release of ballots, and there are mounting calls for a federal criminal probe.

At 7:41 am, local time, with 100% of all precincts reporting in District 10, the vote count was 39,471 to 34,096, giving Darling a 54% to 46% victory over Pasch. Some Democratic party members have softened their criticism of Waukesha County clerk Kathy Nickolaus, while others are alleging election fraud.

After the shooting of an unarmed man by London’s Metropolitan Police force, in Tottenham, the community organized a peaceful protest, which through a series of events that remains difficult to trace, turned into clashes between police and youths. A rash of riots have now spread across greater London, with arson attacks, looting, and violent clashes between masked youth and armored police.

Prime Minister David Cameron has, after three nights of the worst violence in London since World War II, returned from his family vacation in Tuscany to deal with the crisis. The prime minister, the deputy prime minister, the chancellor of the Exchequer and the Home secretary, were all out of the country, as the violence erupted. Cameron has now called Parliament into special session for hearings on the violence.

More than 500 people have been arrested, and buildings across London have been burned, including furniture company run by the same family for five generations, and a warehouse holding major inventory for independent record labels. Several independent labels may have seen their entire UK inventory destroyed in the fire.

The violence has now spread not only across London, but to other major cities across England, including Manchester, Birmingham, Liverpool and Bristol. In some areas, curfews have been imposed, and cities are mobilizing large numbers of police to secure the streets. Fires have been set, buildings burned to the ground, and there are videos splashed across the Internet showing rioters attacking police lines.

In London, the effort to clean up the damage, after three nights of looting and arson, have brought people together. The hashtags #prayforlondon and #riotcleanup have been top trends on Twitter today, and residents are posting photos that show the solidarity of citizens joining together to counter the violence and erase the scars of the rioting.

Police are now being deployed en masse, with Prime Minister Cameron promising massive numbers of arrests. As many as 16,000 police will be deployed to “flood” the streets of London, in order to prevent a fourth night of arson and looting. On Monday night, police in London used armored vehicles and anti-riot squads to disrupt the violence and clear the streets.

According to the Guardian:

Senior officers say the violence and looting on Monday night was the worst in living memory; eclipsing the 1980s inner city riots in Toxteth, Brixton and Tottenham at the height of Margaret Thatcher’s premiership.

Armoured vehicles – known as Jankels – were brought in during the early hours of Tuesday morning in Clapham Junction where much of the worst looting and arson took place. The vehicles were driven on to Lavender Hill to push back a crowd of 150 looters who had smashed up Debenhams and other stores and businesses in the area. Jankels were also out in Hackney.

That the riots are occurring now, under the most extreme austerity measures imposed on public services since the Thatcher premiership, has raised criticisms of the Cameron government, suggesting that his policies have been socially unfair, politically biased and economically ill-conceived. Critics are now expressing concern that the UK is undergoing the beginning phases of the “austerity riots” that are threatening to bring down the Greek economy and government.

In Athens, the rioting has been only one element of the response to austerity measures. The protest movement of the “indignants”—similar to the encampments in cities across Spain—is staging massive, persistent, peaceful demonstrations, and urging the ouster of the government, in favor of a new administration focused on healing economic inequities and fostering generalized prosperity.

According to the Montreal Gazette:

Politicians, including Lammy, have been quick to blame the riots and looting on Saturday night and “copycat” outbreaks of violence elsewhere in London on Sunday and Monday on small groups of criminals.

But locals and commentators warn that high levels of long-term and youth unemployment and cuts in services like youth centres in places like Haringey – the borough where Tottenham sits – are creating a tinder box for unrest.

There are concerns that the dysfunctional and obsessive focus of the American political system on austerity may lead to street violence there as well, and some say recent violent assaults by large “flash mobs” in central Philadelphia are the early example. A report from the credit rating agency Moody’s warns that austerity measures in the US could undermine “social cohesion” and lead to outbreaks of violence. The Telegraph reports:

Former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld is being sued for allegedly formulating policies that led to the torture of multiple American citizens, at the hands of American military personnel in Iraq. Now, for the second time this month, in two distinct cases, a federal court has found that Mr. Rumsfeld does not enjoy any immunity for actions occurring either during his service as Secretary of Defense or in a war zone.

The government had argued that Mr. Rumsfeld enjoyed a special immunity from liability for any actions taken during his tenure as Secretary of Defense or for any activities that occurred in a war zone. The two criteria, according to the court, would result in the essential stripping of any right of citizens to seek redress for grievances against public officials or against unlawful military action in a “warzone”, loosely defined—there was never a formal declaration of war against Iraq.

According to the Christian Science Monitor:

“We agree with the district court that a … remedy is available for the alleged torture of civilian US citizens by US military personnel in a war zone,” Judge David Hamilton wrote for the two-judge majority.

He said the government’s argument, if accepted, would “deprive civilian US citizens of a civil judicial remedy for torture or even cold-blooded murder by federal officials and soldiers, at any level, in a war zone.”

“United States law provides a civil damages remedy for aliens who are tortured by their own governments,” Judge Hamilton wrote. “It would be startling and unprecedented to conclude that the United States would not provide such a remedy to its own citizens.”

The court’s finding is consistent with other cases, where serious crimes have been alleged and government officials were found to have been involved in ordering, overseeing or condoning the unlawful activity. In Mr. Rumsfeld’s case, it is public knowledge that he helped Pres. George W. Bush institute a program of “harsh interrogation” techniques and military detention without charge.

The lawsuit is likely to open up, in some cases for the first time, details of how the use of the term “enemy combatant” came to be applied in what some constitutional scholars say was an unprecedented campaign of extrajudicial detentions. It is also likely to bring into court some startling revelations that emerged when WikiLeaks released documents detailing official awareness of extreme, and even fatal, methods of torture being used by Iraqi forces.

According to official US government documents, US soldiers reported the torture being conducted by Iraqi military personnel on at least 100 separate occasions to their superiors, but were uniformly ordered, by command “at the highest levels”—reports the Christian Science Monitor—not to intervene.

According to the court filings, Donald Vance and Nathan Ertel were in Iraq working for a private military contractor, when they became suspicious the company was engaged in corruption. The firm’s reaction, allegedly, was to strip them of authorization to enter the so-called Green Zone—relegating them to urban areas subject to persistent open combat.

Vance and Ertel then took their case to the US Embassy, to ask for assistance. The two men allege that instead of being rewarded for blowing the whistle, they were detained and held incommunicado by the US military. They say they were subjected to phyical and psychological abuse throughout their entire term of detention, and that Mr. Rumsfeld was the government official who orchestrated the type of detention and abuse to which they were subjected, with no foundation in law.

The appeals court ruling brings the case one step closer to a full hearing, and raises the possibility that Rumsfeld could be found personally liable for criminal abuse, illegal detention and civil rights violations, in civil court. Such an outcome would almost certainly raise the prospects for domestic criminal charges against the former Defense secretary, and possibly other officials of the former administration.

In a stunning move, the American Conservative Union (ACU), which runs the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC), has barred one of its former sponsors, a conservative gay rights group called GOProud. The ban comes just as moderate Republicans are calling on the party to embrace same-sex marriage and gay rights, put the culture wars behind them, and focus on conservative principles more in line with Constitutional freedoms and market economics, as their platform.

The decision was announced in a letter from Gregg Keller, national executive director for the ACU, which read, in part:

The American Conservative Union is preparing to open registration and announce sponsorship opportunities for our Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) 2012. As a courtesy to your organization, a previous co-sponsor of CPAC, this letter serves to inform you GOProud will not be invited to participate in a formal role for CPAC events scheduled during the 2012 election cycle.

The decision is certain to draw a new rift in the conservative movement, as libertarian conservatives continue to pressure the Republican party to graduate into the present day, honor the personal liberties enshrined in the Constitution, and put an end to the culture wars. It may also split the Republican primary field, as many now believe it will not be possible to continue anti-gay politics as a platform issue, without forfeiting national elections.

The Democratic party may see an opportunity here, to intensify its pressure on the GOP, which is increasingly being seen by voters—according to recent polling—as a party unwilling to cooperate in constructive governing, riven by ideological radicalism, and determined to attack seniors, the underprivileged, immigrants and other minorities.

Former New York City mayor Rudolph Giuliani said, after his state legalized same-sex marriage, with Republican support, said it was time for the Republican party to support same-sex marriage and ev0lve. Pres. Obama, who has said his own views on the subject are “evolving”, has consistently supported gay rights and the move towards full equality in civil marriage. In July, the Pentagon ended its “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy, ending centuries of discrimination against homosexual soldiers.

Fred Karger, the only openly gay Republican candidate for president, has reported being barred from conferences and debates, and has written a scathing indictment of the ACU, for the Guardian newspaper. In his piece, Karger writes:

Alberto “Al” Cardenas, the new head of the American Conservative Union (ACU), has taken bigotry and hypocrisy to new heights. I believe I was a victim of his organisation’s prejudice earlier this year when I wanted to purchase a booth at their annual CPAC gathering in Washington, DC. My credit card information was taken last December, and I was told that I was in. Then, mysteriously, three weeks later, I was told by phone that they had “sold out”. Funny, others were purchasing booths right up until the conference began in mid February.

As the first openly gay candidate to run for president of either party, I have hit some bumps in the road, but I have to say that my treatment by the American Conservative Union was the most hurtful and hateful to date.

Now they have taken it up a notch: they have just announced that the gay conservative Republican group GOProud is not allowed a booth at next winter’s CPAC conference (pdf). Cardenas is not saying to GOProud that CPAC has “sold out”; he is saying, simply, STAY OUT!

CPAC is holding an event in Florida, on September 23, and Karger says he was not invited to attend. He will be asking all of the other Republican presidential candidates to boycott the event, so long as the ACU maintains its ban on his participation or on GOProud participating in next year’s conference.

TheHotSpring.net :: Yemen may be where the Arab spring, this sweeping current of democratic upheaval in the Arabic-speaking world, takes a turn definitively toward violence or toward civic solutions. The regime of Ali Abdullah Saleh, a tribal dictatorship using feudal power tactics, based in the capital Sanaa, is now waging one war against extremist Islamists and another against non-violent pro-democracy protesters.

Yemen is an intensely poor country, likely to see its dwindling fresh water resources 100% depleted before any nation in the world, and could be the global home-base for jihadist extremists. Yemen could also, however, be a sparkling example of how peaceful democratic change can bring sustainable prosperity and security to an otherwise impoverished society ruled by feudal warlords and kleptocratic dictators.

The gap between the democracy movement and the regime is stark: while protesters are lawyers and doctors, university professors and economists, the dictator Saleh has only a high-school-level education. Saleh’s former allies have tired of his brutality, and are demanding that he immediately cease all violence against civilians, and honor his multiple pledges to leave power, allowing for a peaceful democratic transition.

Much of the country is illiterate, and tribal politics continue to be an easy way to sow division, to justify cold-blooded killing, and to undermine the progress promised by peaceful protesters. Even the government seems unable to comprehensively put down the Islamist militia vying for power in the deep south. And neither the protesters nor Saleh have been able to fashion a secure plan for bringing prosperity back to Yemeni ports on the Gulf of Aden.

The Yemeni democracy movement is well read, well educated and rooted in a commitment to nonviolence. Yet there are grave concerns that if the regime succeeds in applying the tactics of Col. Muammar Qadhafi—the once and possibly former Libyan dictator of four decades—Yemen could descend into a failed state status reminiscent of its neighbor across the water, Somalia.

Heavily armed Somali pirates—linked to a vast black-market criminal network which feeds the ongoing Somali civil war—have become a menace to global shipping through the Gulf of Aden, the main southern route of entry into the Suez Canal. That vast criminal network has expanded the power of Islamist militia in southern Somalia, and has contributed to the intensification of drought, famine and social collapse.

Yemen may be more at risk than Somalia in many ways, should collapse follow the atrocities committed by Saleh against the Yemeni people. The pro-democracy movement needs to maintain its non-violent approach, but plan for significant innovations and improvements in the process of governing and of economic development and planning.

Yemen is strategic enough to warrant major foreign investment, debt forgiveness and development aid, and its ports might be able to benefit from a secure, reliable, democratic challenge to the armed chaos in Somalia and throughout the Gulf of Aden. Mokha (on the Red Sea), Aden and Ta’izz could form a powerful new economic hub for regional trade, facilitating passage from the Gulf of Aden into the Red Sea.

Ta’izz, the intellectual capital of Yemen, could develop into the administrative center of power governing the new port industry. Such an outcome would be very much in the interests of the international community, as Ta’izz is the virtual home base of the surprising, liberal and modern pro-democracy movement.

Al Mukallah, in the remote east of the country, could be a first-stop along the coast of safe passage, if such a situation could be cultivated and secured. Mokha could be a Red Sea trading post, bridging the African and Asian continents in ways strategically designed to sow stability, mutual interest and prosperity.

The United Nations would likely need to be involved in helping to secure a fledgling Yemeni democracy against the chaos and sabotage sought by militant groups on the one hand and by regime loyalists on the other. But the development strategy makes sense for the region and for the wider world: instability anywhere inflates risk everywhere, and long-term planning for the Gulf of Aden trading zone is more than worth any time, effort and resources required to lay the groundwork.

An added benefit would come to Yemen, which as a safe harbor state with revitalized, modernized port cities, would be able to more easily gain access to an affordable imported flow of fresh water, and to afford state of the art desalinization facilities. We know that fresh water resource is urgently needed to prevent the total collapse of civil society in Yemen, and brining that resource value to Yemen could raise its profile among Arabian states, building into the fabric of economic cooperation which as of now, eludes it almost entirely.

The road from Mokha to Sanaa, like the road from Aden to Sanaa, should run through Ta’izz, allowing for what could become a virtuous feedback between the ideals of democratic government and the ideals of a vibrant trading culture in which not all wealth flows to or through the hands of the individuals who hold political power. It could create a more balanced and decentralized relationship between the people of Yemen and the power of those who govern them.

In short, the storied and problematic history of Yemen, along with the vast and surging need for new economic development, creates a real opportunity for massive coordinated international assistance to the nonviolent political activists who are seeking to build a modern, democratic civil society, and to build unprecedented cooperative links between Yemeni society and the outside world.

Gordon Brown, the former UK prime minister and chancellor of the Exchequer denounces “the systematic criminality of News International”, accusing the media conglomerate of “lawbreaking on an industrial scale” and of abusing the rights of citizens, crime victims and the families of soldiers who lost their lives in war, for financial gain by the most cynical methods. He added that Murdoch’s UK tabloids had “brought the rats out of the sewer” and acted in league with the “criminal underworld” to attack the innocent and vulnerable.

Brown accused News International not only of using criminal activity to target and to persecute innocent and vulnerable citizens, but of attempting to engineer a systematic sabotage of the BBC, and to establish a de facto monopoly over British media and politics. He accused top News Corp. executives of using their influence and their personal relationships to intimidate public officials. He alleged there was constant resistance by News Corp. to Labour’s view that the UK needed a diverse media, including financially disinterested news sources, in order to have a free media.

TheHotSpring.net :: As the Pentagon issues its official cyber-security posture, it is imperative that we move into the era of strategic cyber-security with one paramount aim: that cyberspace not be militarized in any substantive way by any nation. Cyberspace should operate much the way our space exploration has worked: aiming for technological superiority and peaceful, international cooperation.

The Pentagon’s publicly released policy report suggests that were a military-type cyber attack to lead to damage and casualties comparable to a conventional military attack, it might be treated as an act of war and warrant a military or cyber-military response. But wisely, at least as is publicly known, there is no existing plan to organize a “cyber force” to militarize cyberspace as already exist with land, sea and air.

The Internet was developed in large part by Pentagon advanced research as a communications tool, to help improve the chances of ably protecting against an intercontinental or sea-borne attack during the Cold War. But as a tool of civilian communication it has far outstripped the projected value and productivity of its original design.

So much so, there is a growing legal movement, across the world, to treat Internet access as a basic human right, on a par with access to clean air and clean water. Knowledge, of course, has nearly the same value, in terms of determining whether an individual or a population will have the ability to compete and to stave off oppression, in a technologically organized global civilization.

Cyber-security is an issue of human rights and democracy. If governments, foreign or domestic, are able to use the Internet to impose their will on otherwise free people, real freedoms can be infringed and democratic societies can become vulnerable to the whims of tyrants. But cyber-security is in many ways like environmental security: just as we have a right to clean drinking water, we have a right to unobstructed access to information.

This should be the aim of any regime of national cyber-security, not the application, or projection, of centuries old military force doctrine to the world of digital information and communication. In the atmosphere of true hyper-convergence, the web beyond Facebook and gMail, the integrated freedom of the individual depends on the integrated civil liberty of the world wide web.

Just as we expect to go about our days without tanks rolling down our streets, we must demand we have the liberty to use the Internet as we choose, and safely, without military intervention or monitoring.

The Libya Contact Group held its most recent diplomatic summit today in Istanbul, to discuss how best to deal with the exigencies of the security crisis there, and possible political solutions. Sec. of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, of the United States, now fully recognizes the Transitional National Council, based in Benghazi, as the legitimate government of the Libyan people.

According to the New York Times:

Speaking at an international gathering here to discuss the five-month-old conflict in Libya, Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton announced that the United States would join more than 30 countries in extending diplomatic recognition to the main opposition group, known as the Transitional National Council, The Associated Press reported.

“The United States views the Qaddafi regime as no longer having any legitimate authority in Libya,” Mrs. Clinton said. “And so I am announcing today that, until an interim authority is in place, the United States will recognize the T.N.C. as the legitimate governing authority for Libya, and we will deal with it on that basis.”

The news is a major breakthrough, as it shows consensus among the NATO powers authorized by the United Nations to use “all necessary measures” to protect civilian life in Libya, and clarifies that the mission to do so can only be completed when Col. Muammar Qadhafi has resigned and left power. The NATO mission is intended to enforce UN Security Council resolutions 1970 and 1973.

The Libya Contact Group (LCG) is also studying how best to deal with severe and mounting humanitarian crisis across Libya, especially in the east, where the military forces of Muammar Qadhafi have been waging a brutal siege against the civilian population. The LCG intends to establish “humanitarian corridors”, starting in the east, in Benghazi, to make sure the civilian population is not cut off from aid by the ongoing fighting.

In recent days, there have been reports from numerous foreign governments that “contacts” with key Libyan officials suggest Qadhafi may be preparing to step down, if a political solution can be reached. There had been reports Qadhafi may have been planning “to blow up Tripoli”, but Libyan officials deny the allegation.

The rebel forces have come under fire from human rights watchdogs who report incidents of vandalism and burning of homes and villages, in areas considered loyal to the Qadhafi regime. Apparently under pressure to scale back such offensives and support efforts to negotiate a comprehensive political settlement, rebels are reportedly holding back from a rumored assault on the capital, Tripoli.

The mounting protest movement in Jordan is organizing massive new demonstrations, calling for constitutional reform that will maintain the monarchy, but establish a fully elected, democratic government. The protests were reportedly sparked by high and rapidly escalating food prices.

There are reports that riot police today attacked demonstrators, though protest organizers say they do not believe security forces linked to the monarchy were involved in any violence. They are calling for comprehensive anti-corruption reform, and the ouster of all political officials linked to corruption and/or intimidation of the civilian population.

King Abdullah II has pledged substantive political reform, including a path to some sort of constitutional monarchy, but protesters now say the reforms have been too slow, and may not be happening at all. There are now demands for immediate action to punish the police responsible for the attacks, against both peaceful demonstrators and journalists.

According to the AFP:

At least 10 people, mostly journalists, were injured on Friday when police tried to stop clashes between pro-reform demonstrators and government supporters in central Amman.

Police used batons to disperse the clashes outside city hall, beating and injuring nine journalists who were wearing orange vests marked “press,” an AFP reporter at the scene witnessed.

The Washington Post is reporting the attacks on pro-democracy demonstrators were carried out by gangs of pro-government demonstrators. It is unclear whether these gangs reflect the wider trend in the region, of regimes using armed thugs to intimidate opponents, in an attempt to debilitate pro-democracy movements.

The Post also reports, however, that King Abdullah II has agreed to key democracy demands: “to have prime ministers and Cabinets elected from parliamentary majorities, but he later said it may take two to three years to put an elected government in place rather than one appointed by the monarch.”

The protest movement that ousted Hosni Mubarak, after three decades of authoritarian rule has returned tens of thousands of people from all walks of Egyptian life to Tahrir Square, to demand significant democratic reform. Protesters say the military governing council has been slow to prosecute former regime figures guilty of corruption and/or crimes against humanity, and alleges it may be trying to slow-walk the revolution into non-existence.

The military council has said it views the protesters occupying Tahrir Square as a “minority” that does not speak for the Egyptian people and which is trying to disrupt the routines of civilian life. Protesters say this rhetoric mirrors that used by the Mubarak regime for three decades to use violence, harassment and intimidation to crush dissent, and they now fear there may be a military offensive against the peaceful pro-democracy demonstrators gathering at the square.

On Wednesday, after the defiant military message accusing the protesters of disrupting Egypt’s recovery, one witness at Tahrir Square told the press that if the military governing council takes a hard line against the peaceful pro-democracy movement, and fails to implement promised reforms, it will be time to call for the military “to return to their barracks” and accelerate the rise of an interim civilian government.

One source of anger among those who helped to stage the peaceful revolution that brought down the Mubarak regime is the large number of detentions (some say over 7,000) of civilians suspected of “disrupting” the military  council’s rule. Protesters also allege there has been little appetite in the military council for prosecuting and punishing former regime officials, or returning assets they may have wrongfully taken control of to the Egyptian people.

There are concerns that mounting tensions may result in a showdown, as protesters say they will not abandon the square until substantive reforms are implemented and real progress is made in dismantling the apparatus of the Mubarak regime. Some observers have accused the military council of prioritizing the power and influence of its own leadership, as Mubarak’s regime essentially established a security state in which most economic activity went through the military, massively enriching top officers.

Gov. Scott Walker has divided Wisconsin like no politician since the 1880s. His government engaged in what critics called a campaign of naked corruption almost from the day he took office. He was accused of illegally using the police to threaten, harass and intimidate the families of his opponents in the state legislature. He was accused of attempting to deploy the National Guard against peaceful demonstrators.

He committed his administration to an extreme proposal to strip public servants of collective bargaining rights, despite having campaigned not on that proposal, but on job-creation. He was recorded on a phone call sting telling an individual he thought was one of the billionaire Koch brothers he would accept a gift vacation in exchange for stripping the state’s public servants of their rights.

Now, in a shocking revelation of election fraud, the Wisconsin Republican party has admitted to entering fake Democratic candidates into the recall election process, in an effort to derail the recall of Republican state senators. The coordinated campaign of election fraud should be grounds for a federal criminal prosecution of those involved in the conspiracy, though tonight’s news is that in early returns, one true Democrat has already won the primary and the other five are leading the fraudulent candidates.

The fake candidate fraud is just one element of what now appears to be a state-wide Wisconsin Republican effort to disrupt the election. There are reports of an out-of-state phone campaign to mislead Wisconsin voters into believing they should not vote and instead wait for an absentee ballot. There are also reports that some poll workers were told to attempt to block any voter not showing photo ID, though photo IDs are not yet required in Wisconsin.

Poll workers were also a target of the campaign to create confusion, as conflicting information was put out, regarding whether existing voter registration rolls were the correct place for a legitimate signature, or whether a signature was required to be entered in a new list of registered voters.

The election fraud, voter-distraction phone calls and alleged attempts to disrupt voter activity at polling locations, come after Walker’s Republican majority in the state Senate held an illegally closed meeting in order to force through legislation that was not prepared or voted according to the established legislative process.

As the recall effort moves forward, it is expected the six Democratic candidates will have a strong chance of winning at least three more seats, enough to retake control of the state Senate. It is expected a recall effort against the governor will get underway as soon as he is eligible for recall, after one full year in office, and that there will now be a coordinated statewide effort to undo the radical reforms imposed in such authoritarian fashion on Wisconsinites.

Newspapers in the UK and TV networks around the world are reporting that UK prime minister Gordon Brown says his bank accounts, property records, his children’s medical accounts and other private accounts, were illegally accessed by the Sun tabloid and/or the Sunday Times, another of Rupert Murdoch’s newspapers in Great Britain. The allegation appears to implicate one or more journalists in gaining private, privileged information relating to the personal health of at least one of Brown’s children, along with other private information.

The former prime minister was first warned of newspapers’ attempt to illegally access personal data regarding himself and his family, as long ago as 2003, raising suspicions of a decade-long campaign of illegal spying. A 2003 Plymouth police investigation, called Operation Reproof, uncovered evidence of the illegal attempts at data acquisition, allegedly an effort by at least one private investigator to purchase private information, on behalf of unnamed journalists.

According to the Guardian:

The purchaser of information on the three Labour politicians was Glen Lawson, another private detective in Newcastle upon Tyne, according to police records and court transcripts obtained by the Guardian.

Lawson, who still trades in Tyneside under the name Abbey Investigations, refuses to say which journalists contracted him to pursue Gordon Brown and other members of the Labour government. He told the Guardian at the weekend: “I am not going to make any comment”.

In September of last year, Wired magazine reported that reporters working under Andy Coulson, who was by then a top media adviser to PM David Cameron, had systematically and persistently sought to spy on hundreds of individuals. According to that report:

Although Coulson has long insisted he knew nothing about the illegal activity, sources who worked at the tabloid told the N.Y. Times Coulson not only knew about it, he actively encouraged it. A dozen former reporters said the hacking was so pervasive at News of the World that everyone knew about it. “The office cat knew,” one longtime reporter said.

It all began to unravel in November 2005, when three aides to the royal family noticed that new voicemail messages received on their mobile phones were appearing in their mailboxes as if they’d already been listened to and saved. Then stories about Prince William began appearing in News of the World that made them think their phone accounts had been compromised.

Mr. Coulson was arrested, and his computer seized by investigators, last week, as information of a programmatic and pervasive conspiracy began to emerge, suggesting that News of the World had routinely flouted the law and spied on thousands of people over several years. It is alleged that “fewer than five” police officers implicated in the scandal may have been made more than £100,000 for their assistance in illegally accessing private information.

Among the alleged victims of the hacking campaign were: the British royal family, the former prime minister, a thirteen-year-old murder victim (whose voicemails were erased by reporters seeking to deny information to all other sources—they face possible obstruction of justice charges), British soldiers killed and wounded in war, victims of the tragic 7/7 terrorist attacks in London. It is now believed at least 4,000 people had their phones hacked by reporters and investigators working for Rupert Murdoch.

There are now allegations that Murdoch’s reporters may also have hacked into the accounts of victims of the 9/11 attacks in the United States. The family of the young girl who was killed say they have had no communications of any kind from News of the World, News Corporation or any of its executives to apologize for the damage caused by its illegal spying on the murder victim.

The office of former British prime minister Gordon Brown has released the following statement:

Gordon Brown has now been informed of the scale of intrusion into his family’s life. The family has been shocked by the level of criminality and the unethical means by which personal details have been obtained. The matter is in police hands. The police have confirmed Mr Brown is on Glen Mulcaire’s list. And sometime ago Mr Brown passed all relevant evidence he had to the police.

(Mr. Mulcaire is the private detective accused of running an illegal campaign of spying on public officials, crime victims, and others, on behalf of one or more of Mr. Murdoch’s publications. He has been under investigation for months, relating to the allegations, before this scandal brought down the 168-year-old News of the World.)

The scandal continues to spread now, as Prime Minister David Cameron has denied knowing about some of the allegations regarding his media director Andy Coulson, despite the Guardian newspaper having provided that information to his top advisers. The leader of the Labour party, Ed Miliband suggested Cameron was not entirely truthful, saying his claim “does not add up”.

With evidence of illegal hacking, bribery and other crimes, now affecting multiple Murdoch publications, the top executives of News International (the UK subsidiary of NewsCorp) are now coming under closer scrutiny. A shareholder’s lawsuit against Rupert Murdoch and other top executives has now been revised to include misconduct relating to the phone-hacking scandal.

The suit had been alleging corporate misconduct relating to Mr. Murdoch’s having used $675 million of NewsCorp money to buy his daughter’s television network. The revision to the lawsuit now alleges “a culture run amok”, in which Mr. Murdoch routinely acted without any effective oversight from the board of directors. One of the plaintiffs alleges that Murdoch’s son, recently promoted to the third highest position in the global firm, is deeply implicated in the illegal spying scandal.

According to Reuters:

Back in May, Grant & Eisenhofer and Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann filed a consolidated Delaware Chancery Court complaint against the officers and directors of Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp (NWSA.O), claiming that the News Corp board fell down on the job when it approved the $615 million acquisition of a film and television production company wholly owned by Murdoch’s daughter Elisabeth. “Enough is enough,” said the 51-page complaint.

Turns out enough wasn’t quite enough after all. Late Friday, facing a deadline to respond to News Corp’s motion to dismiss the case, the plaintiffs firms amended their complaint to add allegations based on last week’s revelations in the News of the World phone hacking scandal. Weighing in at 94 pages, the newly-amended complaint accuses the News Corp board of ignoring the tabloid’s “unlawful and reprehensible activity” even as the evidence of the scandal built.

Rupert Murdoch is now also facing the possibility of being denied the right to take over control of BSkyB, the satellite broadcaster of which he currently owns 39%. He had sought to prevent an investigation into the legality of the takeover, fearing an investigation could prevent the takeover. Now, he has floated a proposal to force an inquiry, in order to prevent political interests halting the takeover.

It is unclear whether an investigation will begin in the United States, after revelations reporters working for Murdoch’s multinational conglomerate may have illegally accessed private accounts of victims of the 9/11 attacks. The allegations relate to police information regarding attempts to buy information regarding 9/11 victims’ private accounts. An investigation in the United States could affect some of Mr. Murdoch’s most prestigious and powerful media properties.

Today, at the White House, at 2pm EDT, Pres. Barack Obama became the first American president to “live tweet”, posting to his Twitter account the question, “in order to reduce the deficit,what costs would you cut and what investments would you keep”, signing it, simply “- bo”. The president then answered questions, selected by “curators” across the country, who sorted through tens of thousands of questions from Twitter users. He had no prior knowledge of the questions, nor did the moderator, Twitter co-founder Jack Dorsey.

He frequently touched on the subject of education, including the need to adapt to the realities of the 21st century by formulating a realistic and dynamic “lifelong learning” policy environment. He also touched on the complexities of budget policy and the need to reform immigration laws to allow for highly skilled immigrants to help create jobs and restore economic vibrancy to the United States. The central theme of his answers seemed to be the need for public officials to come together and deal pragmatically with practical crises.

TheHotSpring.net :: Citizens Climate Lobby is an international non-partisan, non-profit volunteer organization, working to build political will for a livable world. To do that, they aim to find an ideologically neutral, democratically viable, market-focused way to reduce the amount of carbon trapped in Earth’s atmosphere and speed the transition to clean, renewable fuels. I am proud to be a member of the organization, and one who is inspired by the passion of its volunteers and fortunate to count so many good friends among its partners.

This past week, the organization took its campaign to Capitol Hill, bringing 85 volunteers to 140 office visits in the United States Congress —both houses, both parties— along with the State Department, the Department of Energy and the World Bank. The project is more than a response to fallout from excess atmospheric carbon dioxide; the CCL project involves connecting citizens with decision-makers on Capitol Hill, to take ideology out of the energy debate, and fashion policy more democratically.

CCL proposes addressing the carbon crisis in a new and different way, which in fact avoids the pitfalls of more complex and unwieldy past attempts at reducing overall emissions: the proposed Carbon Fee and Dividend Act of 2011 would put a fee on carbon-emitting fuels at the source, then deliver 100% of that money directly to American families and households.

The plan avoids the need to create burdensome new regulatory infrastructure, does not deliver any new revenue to the federal government, and turns the power to forge a brighter, more economically efficient energy future back over to the American people, the marketplace. By unmasking the massive externalized costs (not paid by industry) of fossil fuel dependency, but covering consumers so the transition is not traumatic, the fee and dividend proposal allows the virtues of a genuine market to operate.

The CCL mission is guided by the principle that when people remain open to one another, to differences of opinion and to opposing views, they can fashion a dialogue based on common vocabulary and put aside ideological biases. This, then, should allow for intelligent people, working to serve their nation in the most forthright and meaningful way possible, to work together to craft practical solutions to practical problems.

Climate destabilization has been turned into an intensely partisan issue, in which ideological assumptions and partisan strategy trump cooperative civics and negotiated problem solving. This is bad for democracy and bad for the human environment, in which impacts from inaction are mounting, and the economic fallout looks to be accelerating, certainly beyond the current window of opportunity to act.

The challenge of the political moment is to find a way around the intense partisan divide, and that is no small task.

On Capitol Hill, there is frustration on both sides of the aisle with the inability of Congress to work together in a responsible way on practical issues, and much of the gridlock is due to ideological bias interfering with sound policy judgment. But the United States now faces another moment of urgency regarding climate and energy: China is racing ahead with massive investment in clean energy resources, even as it expands at record pace its use of the dirtiest form of fuel, coal.

The Chinese agenda, to take control of the global marketplace for new technologies, not by manufacturing alone, but by developing the newest, most cutting-edge technologies that will build the future economy of the world, means the United States now sees its dominance in technological innovation and research and development threatened. If we, as a nation, do not succeed in building the foundations for the global clean energy economy of the 1st century, our ability to compete internationally, and to thrive domestically, will face constant pressure.

The most advanced intelligence work of Pentagon analysts has found that sustainability and security are now intertwined and cannot be disentangled: economic sustainability, environmental sustainability, the sustainability of alliances, of political borders, of nation states, of an economic model that allows us to thrive in relative peace and security, are all linked, and the emerging national strategic narrative [pdf], capable of addressing the complexity of the global environment, needs to rethink the paradigm of threat and risk, and view such challenges as opportunities to shape and influence the landscape of human civilization, for the better.

The great success of this week of CCL lobbying on Capitol Hill was that individual volunteers, the citizen-based movement as a whole, and some of those who sat in meetings with the organization, experienced breakthroughs in terms of openness and interest in dealing with this issue as one of practical problems demanding practical solutions.

It is CCL’s mission to work with members of Congress of all variety of ideological inclinations, many of whom have never been able to share a constructive conversation about climate or energy, with one another, to build a coalition based on citizen interest and a shared vocabulary for building a vibrant and resilient, cutting-edge clean energy economy, through which sustainable American prosperity and quality of life can be secured in this century.

It will be citizens who build, manifest and deliver the political will to achieve these vital goals, and success will mean the strengthening of our democracy and our economic future.

IndependentsOfPrinciple.com :: Spain’s May 15th movement is often called the revolution of the indignados, indignant at the failure of elective government to solve the problems that increasingly define the lives of ordinary people. The complaint, succinctly, is that the powers that be are collaborating in a systemic failure to live up to the rigors of a healthy, legitimate social contract.

Working people, young adults with university degrees but next to zero job prospects, families pushed from their homes by a real estate boom now shown to be a speculator’s wild west show, congregate, organize assemblies, vote on matters of policy, and demand meaningful political change. They argue together, though often in clashing voices, that the political system is rigged against the majority of ordinary citizens.

The demand has been centered on an opposition to all forms of violence, and a call for civic cooperation, for citizenship and for a recommitment to enforcing and expanding basic rights. It is a movement that draws inspiration from Tunis, from Cairo, from Madison, which positing a new world in which the people, and not the powerful, decide.

Yesterday, in Barcelona, the pressures of the moment briefly turned to violence, and it has to be said the May 15th movement, decentralized as it may be, denounced the violence of some protesters and called for an end to all forms of violence.

The clashes between demonstrators and police, the Mossos d’Esquadra, seem to have begun when the police tried to disperse throngs of thousands who sought to block access to the Parc de la Ciutadela, where Catalunya’s Parlament does business. The estimated 2,000 demonstrators wanted to stop action on a budget they say will harm ordinary Catalans.

The police reportedly moved into the crowd, trying to open safe passage for members of the Parlament, around 6:30, but as the protesters would not move, the action turned to physical force. Many were injured in the clashes, and the action radicalized the demonstration.

Several members of the Parlament were intimidated or assaulted, being sprayed or having paint thrown at them. Police used batons against people in the crowd, with photos showing what appear to be assaults on non-violent bystanders and people trying to flee. The melee was the latest in a series of security missteps, but the movement insists violence is not an option and can never be part of their protest actions.

The last violent clash in Barcelona came in late May, when the Mossos d’Esquadra tried to clear the Plaça Catalunya by force, in order to make room for a soccer celebration. Over 120 people were injured, and the movement became more entrenched.

There seems to be a bias among agents of the political system toward the idea that they are the legitimate representatives of a functioning social contract. But democracy demands recognition of the fragility of that shared obligation to abide by rules of civility and deliberative government.

It is often the presumption of one’s own superiority that leads to the breakdown of the social contract, and a descent into violence. Movements like the May 15th indignados and the Egyptian uprising test the boundaries of political power, calling into question the devotion of those who wield power to the principle that even they, or they especially, are subject to the law’s constraints.

Non-violent protest aims to show the moral inferiority of those who wield power unjustly, thus to pressure them to shift position and return some power to the people. It is a way for people who do not hold political power to enforce the terms of the social contract.

Spain enjoys a functioning representative democracy, but many of the Spanish people feel the system ignores their needs and tramples on their rights. Yesterday in the Plaça Sant Jaume, one of the chants heard with coordinated vocal force was “No Más Crisis”, essentially “no more crashes”. It was a demand that banks not be rewarded for causing economic chaos and that social infrastructure not be degraded by austerity and rescue packages.

The conservatives now in charge in Catalunya are seen as being too close to the banks, and too distant from the people. But the movement of the indignados is not just opposition to the political right; the complaint has gathered force because the popular view is that in Spain, all parties are collaborating in a wave of fiscal actions that seem likely to prolong the crisis and further diminish the political influence of ordinary people.

There does not seem, for instance, to be a recovery plan, as was implemented by the Obama administration in the United States. Spaniards have now lived three to four years with the agony of economic collapse, and there is a sense of vertigo, that the IMF and EU might be moving in with imposed austerity measures most people believe will make matters far worse.

45% of young adults are unemployed across Spain, and yesterday, the defiance of political leaders who refuse to hear the popular complaint about misguided priorities was accompanied by a police action seen by some as an attempt to violently suppress the people’s voice. When the social contract is in such crisis, tensions flare.

The attacks on members of Catalunya’s Parlament were unjust and undemocratic, but there can be no room for police using force against unarmed civilian demonstrators. Far from showing the illegitimacy of Spain’s new citizen assembly movement, the Catalan situation is showing how desperately fragile is the standing social contract for many in this economically besieged society.

The appropriate response to rhetorical and ideological disharmony is conversation. It is in the debate of ideas that a legitimate democratic government finds its footing. Politicians in Spain need to be clear: it is a legitimate democratic social contract we seek to uphold and expand, not an established order of haves and have-nots.

Today, the Spanish press are reporting that one in three Spaniards is now eating worse than before the crisis. Lower quality food, less nutritional value, smaller portions, more health problems. And many believe the one-in-three figure is understated—people will complain of hardship, but are averse to report personal weakness or a failure to be responsible about their health, whatever the cause.

One of the most important differences between what is taking place among the movement of the indignados and what is perceived to be the case, I’m the press, is the manner in which the protest movement has committed itself not only to civility, but to civics and to social action.

While conservative politicians who favor dismantling corporate regulation focus on an incident in Barcelona, the cause of which remains unclear, the indignados across Spain have joined with vulnerable neighbors who are on the verge of being evicted due to what are widely perceived as predatory lending practices.

Antisocial lending practices, which have ruined the finances of individuals, families, towns and cities, and may lead to the nationalization of four bank chains by the end of the year, have motivated a backlash among people of every age and socio-economic class who firmly believe lives should not be ruined by that way in a democratic society.

There are obligations unique to those in positions of leadership or public service, and powerful interests that benefit from the organizational health and cooperative efficiency of a free society have similar responsibilities. Spain’s movement to redefine democracy by involving citizens more directly is a sign of how the lessons of Tunis and Cairo are enriching the landscape of modern democracy, and it should be an example to those who serve.