No Comments

Natalya Estemirova & the Plight of Human Rights Investigators (discussion)

Printer-friendly
Email article

Related subjects: Darfur crisis, Diplomacy & Politics, Discussion Forum, Media, Open Government, Press Freedom, Rights & Freedoms, Security & Surveillance, The Russian Federation, TheHotSpring.net, Transparency Yield Comments Off

5 August 2009 :: staff

Human Rights Activist Estemirova Murdered in Chechnya :: Natalya Estemirova, from the Russian human rights organization, the Memorial Human Rights Center, was kidnapped today while leaving her home in Grozny, the Chechen capital, and later found dead. She reportedly shouted to bystanders “This is a kidnapping!” No one was able to intervene, as four armed men grabbed her and put her into a white automobile. [Complete text...]

Natalya Estemirova is only the most recent victim of an apparently politically motivated assassination, carried out against a journalist or human rights worker investigating atrocities committed against civilians in furtherance of corrupt uses of state power. In an article on “Journalists Around the World at Risk of Violence or Imprisonment“, we explored this May the problem facing journalists across the globe, who still face mounting and extreme dangers just by virtue of doing their jobs.

Conflict zones are especially dangerous places, and even nations with a long and successful history of defending and promoting freedom of the press, like the United States, have warned crusading journalists that stepping outside strict protocols could put them in harm’s way with no guarantee of protection (Iraq war, 2003).

The north Caucasus region, Sudan’s Darfur, eastern DR Congo, Sri Lanka, Iraq and North Korea, are just an example of the range of physical risks journalists are facing. How can governments and news agencies work together to ensure greater freedom and better guarantees of protection for journalists doing the most necessary and most perilous work?

PDF Download    Send article as PDF   
Printer-friendly Email article

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Against the Good Nukes / Bad Nukes Fallacy

Cynicism often lends itself to the construction of intellectually convenient, overly facile descriptions of future events, which —bolstered by the impassioned worries and self-promotion of the cynic, the anti-prophet— quickly assume an air of prophetic certainty. Buoyed by the psychological satisfaction of carrying prophetic certainty within, the cynic then commits more and more fully to the proclamation of unshakeable doctrines about the future, based on bad-faith arguments and a passion for the despairing global outlook.

Complete article...
CafeSentido Partner Sites: The Hot Spring Network :: Truth-First.com :: Words Against Chaos :: ThoughtPossible.com :: Elindulnék.com :: Naufragios :: Casavaria.com