3 Comments

  1. Climate Bill Could Bring Total Energy Revolution | CafeSentido.com July 2, 2009 @ 6:42 pm

    [...] Going Deep Green: renewables to guarantee clean energy supply for export (discussion) [...]

  2. Is Obama’s Economic Team Really Ready to ‘Green’ the Economy? | CafeSentido.com July 3, 2009 @ 1:49 pm

    [...] Going Deep Green: renewables to guarantee clean energy supply for export (discussion) [...]

  3. L’Aquila Major Economies Forum Takes on Climate Change | CafeSentido.com July 10, 2009 @ 5:14 pm

    [...] Going Deep Green: renewables to guarantee clean energy supply for export (discussion) [...]

Going Deep Green: renewables to guarantee clean energy supply for export (discussion)

Printer-friendly
Email article

Related subjects: Building the Green Economy, Carbon Emissions, Climate Change, Discussion Forum, Economic Recovery, Energy Supply, Environment & Ecology, J.E. Robertson, Renewable Resources, Sustainable Development, TheHotSpring.net, U.S. Economy, U.S. Environment, Zero-combustion Paradigm Comments (3)

29 June 2009 :: J.E. Robertson

The US is considering a climate and energy bill, H.R. 2454, the American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009 (ACES), amid much controversy over competing methods of calculating costs and benefits. Climate skeptics that rule out global climate change as a real long-term cost are concerned that energy-industry economics will be “distorted” by this legislation, leading to massive losses across the economy; environmentalists are concerned that widespread rapid climatic variation could destabilize not only natural ecosystems and reliable agriculture, but political institutions, borders and nation states.

An economically viable move away from carbon-based fuels would be beneficial for the US in alleviating the economic stresses of dependence on a specific resource and on the foreign governments who are its largest producers. It would also protect against the public health risks associated with air pollution from burning coal. If China, with four times the US population, were to reach the US per capita consumption of combustible fuels, it would emit the equivalent of 100% of the entire world’s emissions at the present time.

To prevent such a potentially harmful scenario unfolding, the US should accelerate its efforts to produce a nationwide clean energy production and distribution infrastructure with capacity of at least two times all US domestic consumption. Full development of wind resources alone in just three states (Texas, Kansas and North Dakota) could meet the entire domestic US energy demand. Products related to generating clean energy could be exported on an industrial scale, helping nations like China and India free themselves from reliance on carbon-based fuels, and the surplus production capacity could allow the US to become a net exporter of clean, environmentally neutral energy.

PDF Creator    Send article as PDF   
Printer-friendly Email article

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Against the Good Nukes / Bad Nukes Fallacy

Cynicism often lends itself to the construction of intellectually convenient, overly facile descriptions of future events, which —bolstered by the impassioned worries and self-promotion of the cynic, the anti-prophet— quickly assume an air of prophetic certainty. Buoyed by the psychological satisfaction of carrying prophetic certainty within, the cynic then commits more and more fully to the proclamation of unshakeable doctrines about the future, based on bad-faith arguments and a passion for the despairing global outlook.

Complete article...
CafeSentido Partner Sites: The Hot Spring Network :: Truth-First.com :: Words Against Chaos :: ThoughtPossible.com :: Elindulnék.com :: Naufragios :: Casavaria.com